egafd.com

Why Trumpy?

From the very beginning I noticed something artificial about him. Behind all this fake blarney and un-funny jockularity, lurks a cunning hard-nosed money grabber of the worst order.

I've be proven correct when it was discovered that whilst hosting the 'Children In Need' charity programme, he was being paid.

He should have been dismissed for this deciet - but no, it's because he has a vast regiment high powered sycophants who are perfectly willing to defend this vile scumbag.

warren zevon rip wrote:
>
> No deceit involved whatsoever. He got paid to present a show
> which he normally does not present. The so-called scandal came
> about because no-on ever bothered to ask him if he got paid for
> it.

The deceit was that a), he didn't volunteer the fact that he was in receipt of payment when hosting a charity and b), the BBC informed the public that all contributors to said event were giving their time free and gratis.

Ted Rogers. No contest, he was like a f*****g ninja with those fingers.

Trumpton wrote:


> > Wogan is plainly more of a cock than a cunt.
>
> Wogan !furious! will always be a cunt to my eyes.

These finer points of British swearing I'll never learn...
What qualifies someone as a cunt as opposed to a cock, or - come to think of it - as any of the two?