egafd.com

The worse one's for tedious plots is the American porn films.You don't get none of that shit with British porn.I do agree with most of you about a quick chin wag with the model before getting down to the bizz.

Another annoying thing about American porn is how the same scenes are played over,to make the scene last long.it looks so obvious.
Do they think we're that stupid? !laugh!

somewhere in between

different themes as opposed to full blown story lines

straight into the action is too repetitive and has ffwd written all over it

storylines in lavish locations add very little to the build up

The less talking/acting the better
Has more chance of feeling & looking REAL

I subscribe to videobox.Brilliant and well worth the fiver a month but 80 per cent is of gorgeous girls being shagged in a studio room and the bloke shoots his load on her face.Too much anal too I feel.No story just 20 mins or so of shagging..BTWI'm amazed at how many blokes, supposed skilled performers, manage to miss!

Hated all those long drawn out yankee ones in the 80s with the out of tune music in too.

well Mr Jimslip directed and filmed nearly all of those (althought others have been credited with the first 3/4 series). But it was edited down to the naked bits, cos i was there for most of the films and thre was a lot of clothed stuff.

I don't care for 'story' but if its something like 'Couples Seduce Teens' or 'Her First Lesbian Sex' like they have in the US then I'm fine with that, it just approaches the same 'guy filming with handheld camera' from a different angle but it does makes it a little more interesting.

I prefer this so-called 'REALITY' porn.

The only porn film I own with anything resembling a story is Hot Cinders, and I only got that because lara lee is in it.

hammer4life wrote:

>do you prefer your porn with a story or without?




Yes.