Page 2 of 2

Re: Bangbabes/ Babestation ect...

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:30 am
by michaeldon1
P.O.V was the best.....more Donna please...

Re: Bangbabes/ Babestation ect...

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:54 pm
by vostok 1
michaeldon1 wrote:
"P.O.V was the best.....more Donna please..."

I am surprised how tame the 900 free to view channels have become in recent months...
The Donna and Yvette p.o.v's are a distant memory now.

Re: Bangbabes/ Babestation ect...

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:05 pm
by michaeldon1
Agreed, Ofcom to blame I guess,but surely if these channels went encrypted or pin protected they could go harder????
P.O.V's were good but would have been better fully nude????
and maybe some male involvment on set...more of a porn feel...it's not gonna happen though,as long as people keep ringing up for the soft stuff and the money keeps rolling in....

Re: Bangbabes/ Babestation ect...

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:24 pm
by vostok 1
michaeldon1 wrote:

"Agreed, Ofcom to blame I guess,but surely if these channels went encrypted or pin protected they could go harder????
P.O.V's were good but would have been better fully nude????"

What I don't understand is the phone shows on the 900 channels not showing the same level of nudity as the fta un-encryted Playboy One channel?

Re: Bangbabes/ Babestation ect...

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:55 pm
by blackjaques
vostok 1, it's the inconsistency of Ofcon's rules that get to you, eh. What a bunch they are. Full nudity is just too explicit, too erotic and too tempting. Must ban it.

Re: Bangbabes/ Babestation ect...

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:31 pm
by michaeldon1
Playboy much wealthier than UK channels so have many lawyers to fend off Ofcom.
Ofcom makes it's money from fines,so hopefully the recent fines against ITV,BBC and Channel 4,might make them turn a blind eye to the 900's,which I'm sure everyone will agree have become softer and tamer.