egafd.com

The day cannot be far off when each home has to have a regulation security monitor ?to protect the citizen? and of course ensure swift retribution and ?re-training? if you commit a heinous thought crime and critisise the government or a social minority - whether they are crap or not.

Tried bit couldn't find it Dibbs !confused!

I'd look again but as previously stated its I think its the usual bollocks + there are some very good links to click next door.

Dibbs is part- windup merchant and part- Tory sockpuppet these days.

Knowing the Tories, there will be money in his pocket from them for him for this.

And knowing them, it will be YOUR money- less money for the poor and pensioners. They don't pay tax- so tax cuts are no good to them.

More Tory lies, cheating and crookery.

"Tried bit couldn't find it Dibbs"

What? What couldn't you find?


"I'd look again"

Look where?


"But as previously stated its I think its the usual bollocks "

You think what is bollocks? Could you elaborate? Have you been drinking, randyandy?


?+ there are some very good links to click next door.?

"Next door"? Links to what, and what?s good about them?




Officer Dibble







Officius Dibblus est amplus amor deus

"Tory sockpuppet these days."

I don't cleave to any particular party. I've voted both Labour and Tory in my time.


"Knowing the Tories, there will be money in his pocket from them for him for this."

Ha! Chance would be a fine thing. Mind you, they could do worse than retain me as their top PR/ communications man (150K a year should do it). They seem a bit ineffectual at getting their message across, what that message should be, and whom it should be targeted at.


"less money for the poor"

Yes, encouragingly, NuLab and the Tories seem to be in agreement on this and have both announced policy initiatives aimed at cutting incapacity benefit and getting 'poor' lead swingers back to work. They'll then be able to earn an honest wage. This will elevate their poverty, allow them a little self-respect and leave a benefit surplus to bung a few extra quid to the pensioners.


"More Tory lies, cheating and crookery."

I don't see any particular party having exclusivity on lies, cheating and crookery. Indeed it has been NuLabour who have recently been in the forefront of seriously financial skulduggery. While NuLab have been in power the Old Bill have twice had to 'invite' the serving PM down to the station to answer a few questions! How does that look to the world? We're not taking fiddling lunch recites or riding your bike on the pavement here, we're talking serious corruption involving industrial fat cats, huge sums of money, strange front companies, electoral irregularities, and tricky donations from moody property developers. Not the kind of business and bedfellows that Kier Hardie would have approved of, I'll wager.



Officer Dibble







Officius Dibblus est amplus amor deus

Officer Dibble wrote:

> "Tried bit couldn't find it Dibbs"
>
> What? What couldn't you find?

Erm the bit I quoted by you.

> "I'd look again"
>
> Look where?

On the links you posted
>
>
> "But as previously stated its I think its the usual bollocks "
>
> You think what is bollocks? Could you elaborate? Have you been
> drinking, randyandy?

The statement you made, and no I haven't been drinking since my illness I hardly do.

I would elaborate but it is abundantly clear by your generalizations that you know nothing about Labour, if you did you would know that when the arty farty tarty lovie types stick their necks out to suggest bollocks they get told what pricks they are, and as such can't be arsed.

> ?+ there are some very good links to click next door.?
>
> "Next door"? Links to what, and what?s good about them?
>

Next door to this forum.

Mai Bailey , Jett Black xxx amongst others + when I see Louise Hodges name I always get nostalgic. Sandie Caine also achieves results but the quality of the clip is a bit poor !tears!

"Erm the bit I quoted by you."

Which bit? I fear we're going round in circles here. If you could quote it then clearly, concisely, and cogently explain what the problem with it is, perhaps I could address any reservations you might have regarding it's legitimacy.


?The statement you made?

Which statement? Regarding what?


?I haven't been drinking since my illness I hardly do.?

What illness? If you were to discuss it, it might prove beneficial to yourself and others.


"it is abundantly clear by your generalizations that you know nothing about Labour,"

Well, having a keen interest in politics and sociology and being an avid consumer off all political comment and journalism I reckon I?m about as well informed as anyone can be without being a party member.


?if you did you would know that when the arty farty tarty lovie types stick their necks out to suggest bollocks they get told what pricks they are?

But surely I do know. Aren?t I one of those who are the most vociferous in telling them just that?


?when I see Louise Hodges name I always get nostalgic.?

Oh, I see. Yes, I get nostalgic most every day, as I see what woeful dross these new ?producer? types are serving up as the objects of male desire. They are surely taking the piss? Or maybe they are just totally oblivious? Louise might have her faults but she also has an abundance of showbiz class, style, and a feminine grace that is all but absent from the contemporary, omigod, chav bird. So at least we are as one on that score.




Officer Dibble







Officius Dibblus est amplus amor deus

Officer Dibble wrote:

> "Erm the bit I quoted by you."
>
> Which bit? I fear we're going round in circles here. If you
> could quote it then clearly, concisely, and cogently explain
> what the problem with it is, perhaps I could address any
> reservations you might have regarding it's legitimacy.

Not sure why we are going round in circles although I have noticed on my original post I didn't use quote as in "Officer Dibble wrote:" just cut and pasted it my fault sorry.
>
> ?The statement you made?
>
> Which statement? Regarding what?

See above.
>
> ?I haven't been drinking since my illness I hardly do.?
>
> What illness? If you were to discuss it, it might prove
> beneficial to yourself and others.
>
It was a brain tumour, but not something I am much open to discussing and don't see how it would be beneficial to others unless its for advice on how to cope with one which I am more than willing to give if anyone finds them self in a similar position.

> "it is abundantly clear by your generalizations that you know
> nothing about Labour,"
>
> Well, having a keen interest in politics and sociology and
> being an avid consumer off all political comment and journalism
> I reckon I?m about as well informed as anyone can be without
> being a party member.
>
> ?if you did you would know that when the arty farty tarty lovie
> types stick their necks out to suggest bollocks they get told
> what pricks they are?
>
> But surely I do know. Aren?t I one of those who are the most
> vociferous in telling them just that?

The only way I feel you can judge someone in the manner you do is by looking fully at what they do. You're constant assumptions are extremely annoying. There are a number of pricks in ALL parties and I am certain that members of ALL parties tell said pricks they are pricks when they are pricks.

Below is one post in the members section of Labour's website (mods please remove if not allowed):

Dear Labour Party members, Organised Crime & Terrorist financing are linked and we have to fix this cancer together. Organised Criminals target our youths age of 16 to 24 for criminal activities. Drugs, Gun Crime, prostitution and terrorist financing are linked. Poverty is one cause of these problems and we have to open up new doors for our local community particularly disadvantage groups and British Ethnic Minorities. British Muslims always question mark to British Governments because of lack of true intelligence and true needs of British Muslims in this diverse British society. We have to work on backgrounds of 7/7 London bombing and we have to work to find out root causes of suicide bombing. What are the inequalities & injustice in this society so those 4 London suicide bombers decide to give up life?s? What are the barriers to hold back British Muslims to mingle & integrate in this British society? One thing is clear 7/7 London bombing were criminal sinful acts and suicide bombers were bad & mad but who made them bad & mad? I want to quote here our Prime Minister Gordon Browns words. He said several times ?we have to win hearts & minds to win war on terror?. Assessing true needs of more than three million British Muslims (Largest group in British Ethnic Minorities) are actually practical steps to way forward to winning hearts & mind our British community and if I truly say then British Muslims are touching bottom line of the poverty in this country. As a Regional Organiser of Ethnic Minority Task Force and elected Political Education Officer for Bradford West CLP and elected Chair of City ward Bradford, I want to put influence to our policy makers to keep on front above mentioned community problems and try to set out our future policies to target these problems to secure our country, local streets, our kids and our families. To see healthy & wealthy strong Britain in future we have to target above motioned problems on priority bases. Our youths are our future. Age 16 to 17 and age 18 to 24 youth?s needs should be on our top priority list as age 16 to 24 youths are our future.

The author has been criticized by a number of members pointing out obvious facts like the bombers being selfish cunts etc (although nice words have to be used).

>
> ?when I see Louise Hodges name I always get nostalgic.?
>
> Oh, I see. Yes, I get nostalgic most every day, as I see what
> woeful dross these new ?producer? types are serving up as the
> objects of male desire. They are surely taking the piss? Or
> maybe they are just totally oblivious? Louise might have her
> faults but she also has an abundance of showbiz class, style,
> and a feminine grace that is all but absent from the
> contemporary, omigod, chav bird. So at least we are as one on
> that score.
>

Glad we agree on the Louise Hodges score she does have faults but she also has a lot of showbiz class and looks damn fine as far as I am concerned.

"It was a brain tumour, but not something I am much open to discussing and don't see how it would be beneficial to others unless its for advice on how to cope with one which I am more than willing to give if anyone finds them self in a similar position."

I just thought 'a problem shared'. I too experienced health issues last summer. Thankfully, it wasn't as bad as I had convinced myself it was, and after a couple of months it resolved itself. But I can tell you; I was so concerned that last July I was mentally drawing my will up. I will share the experience at some point, as I feel it will be interesting and helpful to others, but I'm not in the mood right now and I kind of understand your reluctance to go into your own episode. I trust you are on the road to recovery?

Regarding my assumptions. I assume you mean me tarring all Labour Party supporters as pretentious, middleclass, luvie fashionistas, who are just in it to rebel against their wealthy parents, their privileged upbringing, while at the same time indulging some romantic delusion of social concern?.... But I don't make any such assumption. I just talk about the middleclass luvie element of the Labour Party because they are now the dominant force in the party; they make all the running. They are the ones that wind me up the most. I fully understand that there are still a few genuine working-class folks who actively support NuLabour. People like Dennis Skinner and some of those union bosses. I don't talk about them much because they are irrelevant in today's bourgeois Labour Party - which (from what I can see) seems to be a party of largely middleclass students, intellectuals, and white collar public sector workers, whose sole aim seems to be to impose their own half baked, head in the clouds, holier than thou, socialist ideology and bugger the interests of the lumpen proletariat with their small ?c? conservatism, whose name the party was set up in.





Officer Dibble







Officius Dibblus est amplus amor deus

Officer Dibble wrote:

> "It was a brain tumour, but not something I am much open to
> discussing and don't see how it would be beneficial to others
> unless its for advice on how to cope with one which I am more
> than willing to give if anyone finds them self in a similar
> position."
>
> I just thought 'a problem shared'. I too experienced health
> issues last summer. Thankfully, it wasn't as bad as I had
> convinced myself it was, and after a couple of months it
> resolved itself. But I can tell you; I was so concerned that
> last July I was mentally drawing my will up. I will share the
> experience at some point, as I feel it will be interesting and
> helpful to others, but I'm not in the mood right now and I kind
> of understand your reluctance to go into your own episode. I
> trust you are on the road to recovery?
>

Yes thank you.
When it was first operated on because it was to close to my spinal column they would only risk taking so much out, believing that would be enough.

Unfortunately it grew back so they went and did the full job.

Thankfully all went well. I had scans every 6 month's but now it is every few years unless I think there is a problem.

> Regarding my assumptions. I assume you mean me tarring all
> Labour Party supporters as pretentious, middleclass, luvie
> fashionistas ......

Yes. There are some and they always seem to get the press etc attention but I feels that's because bollocks makes a good headline.

I open my comments on party boards with "I really do despair when I read...." or something similar.
Many others do the same and the 'educated numpties' quite often disappear.

The original quote I used in my last post received a few responses but not a single one told the author well done you've hit the nail on the head.

One of the best responses I've seen (although can't remember exact wording) was when of the educated numpties asked how the health service could be improved, with the answer being what the hell do we (outside of the health service) know about improving it.....

One other thing I would say with regards to "I fully understand that there are still a few genuine working-class folks who actively support NuLabour. People like Dennis Skinner and some of those union bosses. I don't talk about them much because they are irrelevant in today's bourgeois Labour Party"

Dennis Skinner and some of those union bosses don't have much weight simply because a lot of what they say is also bollocks and irrelevant today.

Them being working-class has nothing to do with it.

>So would you rather have a Tory government, Dibbs?
>One where gun controls become so lax that someone can shoot 17 kids dead, at, say, a Scots school.

That's an ignorant and unworthy comment. Controls on guns were very strict, they just weren't enforced in the case of Thomas Hamilton. Whether that was because the Central Scotland police were useless or bent is another matter. The fact remains that Lord Cullen held an inquiry and did not recommend that handguns should be banned, that was down to NuLabor shroud waving at their conference. I knew from that moment they were a corrupt shower of shite, and have not been disappointed.