Page 2 of 3
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:15 am
by Ace
...........along with your good self Steve !wink!
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:15 am
by steve56
Cheers for that Ace.
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:59 am
by mart
Punk = noisy crap created by and appreciated by fukwits.
Mart
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:46 am
by Pervert
Amen to both those sentiments, Ace.
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:53 am
by Ace
There are a few more decent blokes here as well Caractacus, yourself included.
Plenty of wankers as well, and I think I fall into that bracket
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:00 am
by Pervert
We all have our moments of madness, Ace, but I doubt you are deserving of the W label.
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:59 am
by Ace
hj4u wrote:
> Another thread that's lost its way.
It lost its way when some forumites posted their opinions about punk rock. Like most posts here, they tend to go off on a tangent, so don't be an arse and contribute something worthwhile !wink!
Re: James Taylor
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:12 pm
by Pervert
Damn! And the purpose of this entire thread was to impress you.
Back to the drawing board . . .
Returning to the main subject, I caught a few minutes of Taylor being interviewed on Hard Talk on BBC News 24 the other night. Last time I'd seen him was on a West Wing episode a few years back and he looked fine. This time, it looked like he had a problem with one of his eyes. Has his health been okay?
Wasn't helped by the interviewer referring to his song "Rain And Fire", though.