Page 2 of 3
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:18 am
by Jacques
So you can't or won't show me the money?
Come on Max you said it had all been proven, show me.
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:36 am
by Don Roobles
you all better be careful i can just see the CIA watching this thread and you lot carted of to guantanamo bay for not liking the Bush!!!
Me personally love a good Bush great to hide behind when i,m on a mission lmao
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:14 am
by stripeysydney
Warren Harding was a paragon of virtue compared to 'Tricky Dicky'. That piece of shit didn't just tear-up the American constitution he wiped his arse on it. Nixon should have been sent straight to jail for a long time.
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:01 am
by Pervert
I wasn't being serious about Warren, SS, just plucked a name out of the hat.
Nixon has to be a big contender in any list of worst US presidents. Anyone who can get a number of negative mentions in Neil Young songs can't be a good guy.
"Ten soldiers and Nixon's coming
We're finally on our own
This summer I hear the drumming,
Four dead in Ohio . . ."
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:51 am
by max_tranmere
I obviously considered Nixon when trying to work out who the worst President in US history was. I still stand by Bush for my nominee. He is the least qualified ever, and it was arranged that he would become President because of the powerful connections and wealth that his dad George H W Bush has. I wouldn't be surprised if George H W Bush is regretting arranging for George W to become President and for his other son, Jeb Bush, to become Governor of Florida. He probably wishes he arranged it the other way around, with Jeb as President and George W in Florida. Daddy Bush probably flipped a coin to decide who he would arrange to get which job and it turned out that way around.
Nixon didn't damage world security like George W did. I don't think he had the terrible resume/CV that George W has either. Jacques, if you read up on George W Bush from objective, unbiased sources, all my claims will be confirmed. Have a look across the internet, read about George W applying to get into the Texas Air National Guard, which was NOT going to Vietnam and had an 18 month waiting list to get in. George W applied 9 days (just nine days) before the compulsory draft for Vietnam and got in that same day! The two people who organised it have come forward and confirmed it. Read-up online and see how this over-priviledged unqaulified twat ended up running the Western world. This is a man who couldn't even name the Prime Minister of India, the second most populated country in the world, for gods sake!
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 1:37 pm
by JonnyHungwell
I don't know if the actual president has much to do with real policy - he's just a front-end for big business and those who pull the strings. Like or loathe Bush, it makes no difference, the same shit would have happened anyway - and the gloomy outlook is it will be much worse under either McCain or O'Barmy.
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:20 pm
by Jacques
Just show me, back up your statement(s).
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:34 pm
by max_tranmere
I have accumilated this information over years, I can not put together a series of links that will convince you in the next few minutes. Some of this has come from books I've been loaned - that are written by unbiased sources, objective media pundits and the like - interviews I've seen on TV by similar people and things online. One builds up information over a long period of time.
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:44 pm
by Jacques
So all this information you told me I could find online ......
Re: Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:13 pm
by max_tranmere
It's well known if you're a Bush watcher. All this is in books and online, yes.