Page 2 of 2
Re: Wot no 4x4's ?!?!?!?
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:36 pm
by crofter
4x4's = 16 wot about that?!?!?!?
Don't let Lizard fool you into believing he owns or knows anything about 4x4's as he has only just got the stabelisers off his revved up mobility scooter!grin!
Re: Wot no 4x4's ?!?!?!?
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:45 pm
by Lizard
Yeah, yeah, yeah, and this from the Man who drinks the petrol he should put in his tank...
Re: Wot no 4x4's ?!?!?!?
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:48 pm
by crofter
yeah but its unleaded guv ... gotta watch my carbon footprint Liz.
Re: Wot no 4x4's ?!?!?!?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:26 pm
by one eyed jack
Whats wrong with 4x4's??? I love big cars. Im a big fella and its nothing to do with status. More to do with practicality as a family car and I drive around the UK doing shoots and plus you never know who you might want to run down effectively with it.
If it was all about status i wouldve got one of those Bentleys.
Tiny cars just dont do it for me. They feel like go carts.
Re: Wot no 4x4's ?!?!?!?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:41 pm
by Roger Fukwit
People that go on about 4x4s get on my wick!
Yes I drive a 4x4 & a very nice one it is too. I drive one cos I fucking want to. Nothing at all to do with it being a status symbol.
As far as I'm concerned I pay ?400 a year road tax, so I'm paying my fair share.
As for the green argument, I get around 25 to the gallon & you try telling me its less green than the 10 year old builders vans that get driven about rarely serviced.
And the quote about them being useless downhill, that's a load of bollocks too. - mine has traction control as do all other Range Rovers / Discoveries / Freelanders & no doubt many other makes.
Re: Wot no 4x4's ?!?!?!?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:43 pm
by Robches
Let's leave Ulrika out of this. She won Big Brother fair and square.