Re: Definately not gay bashing
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:21 pm
True, jj. Anyone can make mistakes when acceptable terms are constantly changing and I doubt many reasonable folk would judge them too harshly.
For instance, it's inappropriate to term disabled people as 'the disabled'. It's 'disabled people'. Working with disabled people in the future I'll have to learn to keep up with these changes! I do think it's nit-picking in this instance, though, and part of me does feel offended that I'm being dictated to in some way. I suppose a lot of people feel similarly and that is the problem. People see political correctness as snotty and interfering and I suppose that's a problem political correctness has to deal with.
That's why I likened it to politeness. People like to be seen to be polite and so I feel you'd get more people on side if they viewed it as common courtesy rather than political correctness. Political correctness gives out an impression of some omnipotent body that judges everything you say, and people will naturally rebel against that.
There is, however, a difference in slipping up, or being slightly aggrieved about being asked to use accepted, appropriate terminology, and being an angry, arrogant child because you can't call them coloureds and benders any more.
As for you being upset at not being able to use 'gay' to mean happy or jolly any more: I say use it! That definition is still correct and because language is dictated by common usage then the more you use it the more the younger generations will know gay has alternate meanings.
I feel in a gay mood after getting that off my chest and I wish you the gayest of weekends! !happy!
For instance, it's inappropriate to term disabled people as 'the disabled'. It's 'disabled people'. Working with disabled people in the future I'll have to learn to keep up with these changes! I do think it's nit-picking in this instance, though, and part of me does feel offended that I'm being dictated to in some way. I suppose a lot of people feel similarly and that is the problem. People see political correctness as snotty and interfering and I suppose that's a problem political correctness has to deal with.
That's why I likened it to politeness. People like to be seen to be polite and so I feel you'd get more people on side if they viewed it as common courtesy rather than political correctness. Political correctness gives out an impression of some omnipotent body that judges everything you say, and people will naturally rebel against that.
There is, however, a difference in slipping up, or being slightly aggrieved about being asked to use accepted, appropriate terminology, and being an angry, arrogant child because you can't call them coloureds and benders any more.
As for you being upset at not being able to use 'gay' to mean happy or jolly any more: I say use it! That definition is still correct and because language is dictated by common usage then the more you use it the more the younger generations will know gay has alternate meanings.
I feel in a gay mood after getting that off my chest and I wish you the gayest of weekends! !happy!