Page 2 of 2
Re: Low tar cigarettes... are they better for you?
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:31 pm
by crofter
Max with that amount of Tar Content in your system you could easily win a major contract tarring a new motorway ... they would just get you to shove your arse in the cement mixer and job done.!wink!
I would seriously consider it (the motorway offer that is not the move to Silk Cut).
Re: Low tar cigarettes... are they better for you?
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:45 pm
by jj
....cough.... splutter.... gag, choke......splutter, puke....
[My morning routine]
Re: Low tar cigarettes... are they better for you?
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:30 pm
by max_tranmere
Will they ever create a cigarette that doesn't have all the chemicals and other crap in it? It will taste a tad differnt, but won't be as unhealthy. If they can turn Coke to Diet Coke to Caffeine-Free Diet Coke I wonder why, if they can make fags with less tar and less nicotine, they can't make them with less and less everything else.
Re: Low tar cigarettes... are they better for you?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:08 am
by jj
The nicotine's the whole point though- otherwise we'd all be
'smoking' chocolate ciggies : -)
Re: Low tar cigarettes... are they better for you?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:55 am
by Deuce Bigolo
I blame those chocolate ciggies from the 70s for my sweet tooth
Re: Low tar cigarettes... are they better for you?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:24 am
by jj
I blame them for my lack of teeth : -)