Re: More dead British Soldiers
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:56 pm
!cool!
I joined the Army for a chance to shoot some fucker. Most soldiers join for that reason, most not all.
Yes Afghan is a hard place, but, it is the best training ground the British Army will have for a long time. Soldiers are doing the job they joined for and yes some of them are paying the ultimate price, but think on. I was serving in Malaya in 1968, and that was the only year in the 20th century that no British service personell were killed due to enemy action. Then in 1969 the first squaddie was killed in Northern Ireland and since then every year more are lost to enemy action.
The present media is ramping up these deaths in Afghan, and yes the soldiers themselves are pissed off with the lack of equipment which makes their job harder and more dangerous, but, they are doing as all soldiers have done since time immorial, they get on with it. Right or wrong, they do it.
I know, I was a soldier and my son has been to Afghan twice.
I joined the Army for a chance to shoot some fucker. Most soldiers join for that reason, most not all.
Yes Afghan is a hard place, but, it is the best training ground the British Army will have for a long time. Soldiers are doing the job they joined for and yes some of them are paying the ultimate price, but think on. I was serving in Malaya in 1968, and that was the only year in the 20th century that no British service personell were killed due to enemy action. Then in 1969 the first squaddie was killed in Northern Ireland and since then every year more are lost to enemy action.
The present media is ramping up these deaths in Afghan, and yes the soldiers themselves are pissed off with the lack of equipment which makes their job harder and more dangerous, but, they are doing as all soldiers have done since time immorial, they get on with it. Right or wrong, they do it.
I know, I was a soldier and my son has been to Afghan twice.