egafd.com

one eyed jack wrote:
I found
> the doc way more interesting than the film.
>
planeterotica wrote:

Is this often not the case with a lot of documentries concerning porn, the porn film is just porn whereas the doc is much more revealing, i have the Debbie does Dallas doc and apparently she had a lot of problems as well.

Yes, I recalled Ms Lovelace saying on a docu that her husband pointed a gun at her and made it quite clear the dog needed exercise.......and I'm NOT talking about getting the leash and walking it!

She denied the bestiality for a long time, until some footage was eventually made public, at which point she said her husband had forced her to do it.

Thanks for putting that all in context with the gu to head thing.

Makes sense it would be something as sick as that


Planeterotica wrote: i have the Debbie does Dallas doc and apparently she had a lot of problems as well.


Do you notice that a lot of people associate porn stars problems with what they do for a living? No one ever discusses an employee from a supermarket chain can have the same perosnality disorders and problems.

The didfference being is that doing porn means they can afford the drugs more than those who do lesser paid jobs.

one eyed jack wrote:

> Do you notice that a lot of people associate porn stars
> problems with what they do for a living? No one ever discusses
> an employee from a supermarket chain can have the same
> perosnality disorders and problems.
>
> The didfference being is that doing porn means they can afford
> the drugs more than those who do lesser paid jobs.
>
planeterotica wrote:

Yes but if you made a doc about some supermarket girl who has a problem you cant put porn in the title and the programme would get a lot less viewers, but dig up some dirt about a pornstar and then make a doc about it and the viewing figures would double along with the advertising revenue .