egafd.com

I certainly bwouldnt want my kids seeing people running around nakes if i were out with them,draw the fcking line somewhere jeez. Keep them innocent.

Thats my point number 6....Children seeing a naked woman is not going to corrupt their innocence.

What part of being naked bar the actual sex act itself is corrupting young minds?

This corruption of young minds is a kneejerk reaction from adults who seem to connect nudity to sexua l thoughts which children dont have.

What adults are doing is perpetuating a repression that nakedness should be equated with shame.

Therein lies a load of psychological problems.

Do you see the Michaelangelo and nude statues as pornographic too. or paintings with womens breasts out in art galleries as corrupting as well?

I totally understand its not for everyone as Essex lad pointed out.

I just dont buy the corruption of young minds and loss of innocence thing.

If the woman was displaying herself in a sexual way then fine but if its artisitc stripping off and in a non sexual way then nakedness is not a problem.

We were all born naked so exactly at what age should nudity become a crime ? i would be more concerned with kids being afronted with violence than nudity, and i agree with OEJ why does society always make a connection with nudity and sex, naked bodies are not always sexy, why do you think the ladies spend hours getting ready to go out if being sexy just meant getting your kit off !wink!

And I respect yours Terry... just saying that not everyone thinks the way we do - as I think Number 6 has shown.

Deano! wrote:

> I notice the policeman's name is "Sergeant Warren Mitchell" -
> the actor that played Alf Garnet in 'Till Death do us Part' was
> Warren Mitchell. No doubt he would have muttered something
> about the 'nig-nogs' lowering the standards etc (with
> appologies to OEJ).

Alf Garnet never called black people "nig nogs". You are getting confused with Love Thy Neighbour.

I've no problem with public nudity, but I've seen the youtube film of this and even I would asking her to put her clothes back on!

She's a bit of a minger.

Oh so its ok if they are minging then.

i think this is something that TV subscribes too like with Gok Wans How To Look Good Naked series.

Seems attractive lithe lovelies with perky boobs are a no no. Naked mingers is ok because is far from sexual.

Makes no difference to me. Nudity is nudity.

I think it is highly amusing the thought processes behind someones removal of garments

I cant help but feel that people have an inherent shame of being compared to animals as if to say clothes make us more civilised when its ok for us to fuck someone out of their countries, blow people up, lop of pretty girls heads in th ename of good old fashioned cinematic entertainment but dare we see a female expose her naked body then its an almighty uproar.

Mentally we still have a bloody long way to go

Essex Lad wrote:


> Alf Garnet never called black people "nig nogs". You are
> getting confused with Love Thy Neighbour.

Yes - you are quite right. It was 'Love Thy Neighbour'. I remember watching that show specifically for the west indian wife who wore hot pants and looked so good to my 12 year old eyes! I think the guy who played the black husband went on to play a cop in the Rowan Atkinson comedy 'The Thin Blue Line'.

Yeah I remember that women. She was mighty fine looking. I cant shake the image of Diana Ross in my mind and wow yeah she was fine back in the day....

Looking great older to last I saw....But that was years ago too So good in fact Michael Jackson went loopy and tried to look like her....Now that was pushing it a bit far Mikey