Doctor Who's new babe

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
WilliamCodey
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by WilliamCodey »

She reminds me a bit of Katie K. I know they don't look that similar but there is something about the cheeky personality and the eyes.
WilliamCodey
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by WilliamCodey »

Bob Singleton
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by Bob Singleton »

WilliamCodey wrote:
[SNIP]

>
> Can anyone explain why the house has got two floors on the
> outside, and three on the inside.

Top floor could be in the roof but windows only on the one side (overlooking back garden) or a basement... that's how a house that looks like only two storeys can actually be three. On the other hand it too may be a TARDIS, which, as we all know, is bigger on the inside than the outside dimensions would have us believe. Final theory, and probably most plausible, is that whoever was in charge of continuity made a cock up!

"But how to make Liverpool economically prosperous? If only there was some way for Liverpudlians to profit from going on and on about the past in a whiny voice."

- Stewart Lee
BGAFD Admin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by BGAFD Admin »

Dr Ooooh! How the Time Lord's saucy, short-skirted new companion sent viewers into orbit

Viewers think new Doctor Who is 'too sexy'

Sourced quotes from both the above articles: "Writing about Amy, one viewer in an online forum asked: 'Why did she dress up as a tarty policewoman? Surely that's not fitting for a family show.' Another said: 'They've completely demeaned Doctor Who by replacing good episode stories with slutty girls.'"

The second quote was lifted from (You have to unhide the post by 'Bad? xD').

Gawd bless the interweb and all who post on it.
a m playlist
Posts: 239
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by a m playlist »

Please, the last thing I want to see on this site are posters getting excited by a mainstream actress doing an all tease, no strip role.

The Doctor's assistant was wearing tights or stockings - her legs were not bare. She might as well have been wearing trousers for all that you could see.

And despite the fact that the TARDIS has a wardrobe, the writers/producers of this show just had to crowbar in an implied CFNM scene when the Doctor stripped off in front of his assistant and her boyfriend.

Ron T. Storm
Posts: 2593
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by Ron T. Storm »

Ooooh MR BGAFD Admin - Never knew we had so much in common. BTW Good posting there fella. Its good to know you r human too and I share same neutral view too with you :)

nikonman
Posts: 2182
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by nikonman »

Judging by the amount of coverage this new Dr Who girl has received in the national press and even on this forum, be it good or bad, I would assume that the BBC has achieved it's ambition to gain maximum publicity for this new series.
I wonder how many will be tuning in next week .

Also how long will it be before photos from her modelling days start appearing in the press, or photo shoots for the lad's mags.
nikonman
Posts: 2182
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by nikonman »

The photos have started to appear.


Is the girl on the right Kaz B by any chance?.
WilliamCodey
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by WilliamCodey »

Serving suggestion - look at the reflections in her red patent leather shoes.
WilliamCodey
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Doctor Who's new babe

Post by WilliamCodey »

I notice that youtube have withdrawn the video referred to by Nikinman above and by the Sun.
But I found a copy here

I guess that this one might get withdrawn quite soon too!
Locked