egafd.com

Alicia fan wrote:

Have the pornogrophers got into my head and is that what they want me to think!?!?

(waves hand like Jedi) Porn is good. We who make porn are all rather jolly good and awfully nice people

For some reason he cannot fully understand, alicia_fan_uk heads off to realcouples.com to type in his credit and debit card details....

Well I`d put pornographers above most journalists. What makes either of those two feminazi`s any sort of expert on porn or the effects it has?
Truth about the porn industry my arse!! The two of them know about as much about the porn industry as I do Bulgarian cheese industry.
I`ll bet the pair of them use the word womyn too.
I think I`ll write about about how feminists are lying frumpy psycho`s who abuse whatever positions of power they have.

In your view,are all pro-porners rather good looking then?

RoddersUK wrote:

> Funny innit, all the self righteous bastards against porn are
> fat and ugly or slim and ugly.

Exactly. When she claimed that some men would rather a porno session than sex with a real woman, I wondered if she'd looked in the mirror for a perfectly straight forward explanation of why this is.

Belfast Birty wrote:

In your view,are all pro-porners rather good looking then?

No. Not necessarily but they arent complaining about it are they? They are more likely to be in favour and relaistic about porn that they would never get a girl like that and pay the fraction of the cost to bash one out instead.

Great article, and some of the comments beneath it were unintentionally hilarious. But it's 'The Guardian' and that's what you'd expect.

I was interested to see her compared to the Andrea Dworkin. Mzzzzz Dworkin used to claim that ALL sex was rape, because women were conditioned not to refuse sex in modern society and therefore were always consenting under duress.

When I was at school (Yes! I actually went!) we had middle aged female teachers just as ugly as Mzzzzz Dines who used to berate the spunky sex-pot girls for wearing their uniforms too short and "dressing like prostitutes". This all happened years before the internet spread.

alicia_fan_uk wrote:

(snip)
> Laugh if you want, but I genuinely believe there is an argument
> that - among several possible examples - something as "normal"
> as buying non-fair trade chocolate (quite likely to have been
> harvested in/around the Ivory Coast via armies of child slaves)
> or sweatshop-laboured clothes from some household High St names
> is far more disgusting than watching consenting adults in your
> average porn film. Am I weird for thinking that? Have the
> pornogrophers got into my head and is that what they want me to
> think!?!?

No you are not weird - this confuses me too. If these activists are so concerned about human rights, why do they spend so much time berating porn fans while never mentioning the horrific way people are treated in real life in so many non-porn related fields? Anti-porn campaigners always seem jealous that men aren't paying attention to them and want to punish them by taking their porn away!

one eyed jack wrote:

> Posting on the BGAFD makes some people violent. I know. I've
> had death threats

Listen OEJ, if you don't stop yer crap I'll fucking KILL myself!!!!

(Is that how it's done?)

More in today's guardian, about porn and the ".xxx" domain:

I did note the article is featured/highlighted on the front page of the print version; sex does indeed sell, even for us Guardian-types.

alicia_fan_uk