egafd.com

vickipeachx wrote:

> you cant compare burglary to using a substence on ones self as
> burglary has a victim...........tell me then.....whos the
> victim of smoking grass?
>
The person who takes it and their families perchance.

> also if you can ''link any mind altering drug with mental
> illness'' then i imagen perscription painkillers would be right
> out:) how could the dentist get you high before pulling a tooth
> if there was a chance it would make you go crazy?

One they are strictly controlled in dosage and strength and two they are not mind-altering drugs in the same way that dope or lsd are. People who used dope themselves are always ready to bore on about how it never did them any harm, though how they're in a position to know, I've no idea.

>
> the war on drugs happens and has happend for the last 60 odd
> years
> but its more a war on people then a war on drugs:)
>
No it hasn't. If any government was serious about the menace of drugs they would treat drug users as criminals not victims. Those, like me, who advocate strict enforcement do not do so because we want to fill the jails with harmless, vegetarian students. Personally I'd favour one warning, with no criminal record, for a first offender - followed by an automatic one-year jail sentence with hard labour and a criminal record, for a second offence. We do it because we want to save thousands of gullible, weak-willed teenagers from taking this dangerous muck and wrecking their brains for life, simply because it is fashionable to do so.

The existence of strict legal penalties, strictly enforced, would give them all an argument against the pressure of their friends and classmates. It hasn't been tried. It should be. It might save someone known to you from a life on the locked ward.

jesus.... there everywhere:)

drink wrecks peoples lifes and that of there familys but that seems to be fine? i have necer met anyone that has had there lifes or familys lifes wrecked by smoking weed. met plenty who fucked up through drinking though.
quote:
''People who used dope themselves are always ready to bore on about how it never did them any harm, though how they're in a position to know, I've no idea.''


ok now thats just retarded. no one has more experience of something more then a user of said substence. clearly they would know if weed was doing them any harm........as its there body and mind so who better to tell if somethings wrong with them!
quote:
"No it hasn't. If any government was serious about the menace of drugs they would treat drug users as criminals not victims. Those, like me, who advocate strict enforcement do not do so because we want to fill the jails with harmless, vegetarian students. Personally I'd favour one warning, with no criminal record, for a first offender - followed by an automatic one-year jail sentence with hard labour and a criminal record, for a second offence. We do it because we want to save thousands of gullible, weak-willed teenagers from taking this dangerous muck and wrecking their brains for life, simply because it is fashionable to do so.

The existence of strict legal penalties, strictly enforced, would give them all an argument against the pressure of their friends and classmates. It hasn't been tried. It should be. It might save someone known to you from a life on the locked ward."

my god you cant be for real! i bet your such a fun fellow to be around....life of the party:)

firstly that didnt work in the usa and now they hold more prisoners then any other country..a shit load of them for drugs. prison makes most captives alot worse then when they went in.....its like crime school.locking simple drug users up is 1. a waste of money, 2. creating more hardend criminals and 3. a crual and nazi thing to do.

i will never understand what drives these so called 'drug crusaders' to ruin and interfear in peoples lifes... they should really just get on with there own lifes..........but then again i tend to find that these hardcore anti drugs nutters are middle aged/late aged ugly white folks who were probly not very populer at school and have grown bitter and resentfull of the cool kids having all the fun:)


btw bgafd love the new icons !shitstorm!

oh and btw


quote:

One they are strictly controlled in dosage and strength and two they are not mind-altering drugs in the same way that dope or lsd are.

if drugs were legal then dosage and strength could be controlled:) just like it is with perscription drugs.

Why?