Flawed arguement
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 5:38 am
Ah the good old pseudo intellectual "there's no evidence of it being a deterrent"
If people went to the police and said they would murder someone but they didn't want to receive the death penalty, and these reports were recorded, this would be "proof" it was a deterrent.
However of course they don't.
What you mean is death row inmates and other murderers said they were not deterred by the death penalty.
Well thats fine because like ALL penalties the penalty itself (speeding fine, overdue library book fine, death penalty) is the punishment for those not deterred by it.
There is no "rule" re non/capital punishment and murder rates and you're trying to use data from an anti capital punishment site to justify your points.
If people went to the police and said they would murder someone but they didn't want to receive the death penalty, and these reports were recorded, this would be "proof" it was a deterrent.
However of course they don't.
What you mean is death row inmates and other murderers said they were not deterred by the death penalty.
Well thats fine because like ALL penalties the penalty itself (speeding fine, overdue library book fine, death penalty) is the punishment for those not deterred by it.
There is no "rule" re non/capital punishment and murder rates and you're trying to use data from an anti capital punishment site to justify your points.