egafd.com

And here we have the same old bunch of paedophilic weirdos
once more assembled.
Its just incredible.
Youre with a woman.Shes naked.Youre about to have sex.
And whats the only thing you can think of doing?
Getting the razor and the shaving foam out and spending a quarter
of an hour?half an hour? Turning her into a surrogate ten year
old.
And you actually think that a video of the results of your
loonishness are what the rest of us want to see.
NORMAL MEN ARE NOT INTERESTED IN WOMEN WHO LOOK LIKE CHILDREN!
YES!! Thats NORMAL men like me as opposed to DODGY WEIRDOS like
you!

Despite the fact that Jeremy Clarkson has expressed himself in an unfortunately agressive way, he has got a point. A bit of trimming and bikini line shaving is one thing, completely shaven is not what I find particularly attractive. And as someone who recently had to shave himself for an operation I can tell you it's not very comfortable either.

I guess you won't be particularly surprised to hear that I'm with Jerry on this one.

Let's be rational and objective. If it's perfectly reasonable to say that everyone who digs shaved fannies is not a repressed pedo then it is also reasonable to say that this is quite obviously the attraction for at least some of those who find this kind of thing appealing. Who could dispute this?

Officer Dibble is not campaigning for hairy fannies - he (and I'll wager the silent majority) just would like to see some 'normal' ones - i.e. unaugmentad. Matt suggests that anyone who doesn?t like it shouldn't watch. A perfectly reasonable suggestion that, as a retailer, I can attest customers have been doing of late. But we all need porno - even those that dig natural girls and at the moment this need is not being satisfied, big time. I find the current status quo very demoralising and depressing.

Oh, love The Sunday Times column Jerry, keep up the good work and what do you reckon to the new Merc AMG SL55?

Officer Dibble.

I guess you won't be particularly surprised to hear that I'm with Jerry on this one.

Let's be rational and objective. If it's perfectly reasonable to say that everyone who digs shaved fannies is not a repressed pedo then it is also reasonable to say that this is quite obviously the attraction for at least some of those who find this kind of thing appealing. Who could dispute this?

Officer Dibble is not campaigning for hairy fannies - he (and I'll wager the silent majority) would just like to see some 'normal' ones - i.e. unaugmentad. Matt suggests that anyone who doesn?t like it shouldn't watch. A perfectly reasonable suggestion that, as a retailer, I can attest customers have been doing of late. But we all need porno - even those that dig natural girls and at the moment this need is not being satisfied, big time. I find the current status quo very demoralising and depressing.

Oh, love The Sunday Times column Jerry, keep up the good work and what do you reckon to the new Merc AMG SL55?


Officer Dibble.

Rational and objective?
I don't think so.......and certainly not logical: it simply doesn't follow that, if you assert (as I and many others do) that liking shaved fannies does not imply paedophiliac tendencies (latent or otherwise), then there must be of necessity some among that grroup that DO have those tendencies.
Do you imagine that we are somehow unable to distinguish between a depilated, fully-grown woman and, say, an 11-year-old, prepubertal child? And that a passion for the former implies a corresponding desire for the latter?
Oh, per-LEASE...........and, BTW, I like pubes present just as much: it's a mood thing. Variety is the spice of life.

its just that when people go to such trouble to get the gynaecological camera angles then it seems a shame to have a sturdy bush blocking all the action. Trimmed or shaved - both do fine by me!

"Jeremy Clarkson the anonymous"as it should be, must be well satisfied. He seems to have got everybody at it.

Shaven/unshaven, tattood, white, black,brown or fucking green; tastes vary, thank God.

I don't like gin but I also do not classify male gin drinkers as aload of poofs. "One man's meat......."I believe I've said this before.

jj wrote:
>
> Rational and objective?
> I don't think so.......and certainly not logical: it simply
> doesn't follow that, if you assert (as I and many others do)
> that liking shaved fannies does not imply paedophiliac
> tendencies (latent or otherwise), then there must be of
> necessity some among that grroup that DO have those tendencies.
> Do you imagine that we are somehow unable to distinguish
> between a depilated, fully-grown woman and, say, an
> 11-year-old, prepubertal child? And that a passion for the
> former implies a corresponding desire for the latter?
> Oh, per-LEASE...........and, BTW, I like pubes present just
> as much: it's a mood thing. Variety is the spice of life.

Now you're just being argumentative. Of course there must be some amongst that group (shaved fanny lovers) that do have those tendencies - if only by chance, never mind anything else. But come, come, jj. It's like suggesting that the sky is green and the grass is blue to maintain that there is absolutely no element of association (in the mind of a latent pedo) between the shaved fanny look and that of the 11-year-old girl. And let's not forget that in the kind of movies where this sort of thing is most prevalent most of the girls are usually quite scrawny, skinny and slim hipped anyway. The term "fully grown woman" is not the term that immediately pops into my head after I steal myself to put one of these movies on. "Fully grown woman" is a term that comes to mind as I gaze at a Rubens - or even that rarity nowadays - a dam good shag video.

Variety is indeed the spice of life so, er, why aren?t we getting any?


Officer Dibble.

With my other hat on, that of model agent, I can tell you that the majority of girls who come to me nowadays,have shaven pussies. Asking them why they do it is akin to defining the theory of relativity. They just do. This is from the girl's point of view.

You accuse me of being argumentative when I rightly object to such egregious nonsense, instead of trying to justify your (completely unsubsatntiated, AFAICT) assertion....
....and then compound the offence by repeating almost verbatim the same tendentious twaddle? Are you seriously suggesting a direct link between a preference for depilation, and paedophilia, latent or otherwise?
I reiterate: any fool can distinguish between jail-bait and a fully grown-woman: hips, tits, etc., without reference to her pubic region. A liking for depilated ladies has no conceivale connection with the tendency to paedophilia.
And, no, I wouldn't necessarily assume there were any potential paedos among the subset of heterosexuals that like bald fannies: any more than I would assume there were terrorists among a randomly-selected group of Muslims.........if the latter is obviously tendentious, why is not the former? There may be, but the mere possibility on its own doesn't warrant the assumption.