Page 2 of 2
Re: Fortnum and Mason
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:18 pm
by Lizard
[img]
http://a3.l3-images.myspacecdn.com/imag ... 4aaf/s.jpg[/img]
Must be all that offal you keep eating, just give me roast beef and some yorkshire's, still it were a good bit ' o copperin young fella me lad....
Re: Fortnum and Mason
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:54 am
by Peter
How come you two are so knowledgeable on the world of uncut men?
Just sayin' !wink!
Re: Andy/OEJ
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:58 am
by Zorro
David
With this clip you have posted you have done exactly what the media, you rant about does, you show a tiny fraction of footage (1min in this case) and claim it is representative of what happened. I am not saying the protesters really cased trouble and deserved to be arrested, but I am saying you can't use 1 min of edited footage as your proof that the police were heavy handed or unfair.
The media used selected footage of a very small number of protested smashing windows and causing trouble, and everyone is up in arms saying the media is being selective and not representative of what really happened. I claim you have done exactly the same thing.
