Page 2 of 2
Re: o/t Re: jordan H/C
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 8:03 am
by woodgnome
correct.
Re: o/t Re: jordan H/C
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 9:20 am
by buttsie
Thanks for pointing that out Last Call,by the way what does padantic mean...my dictionary was made in 1947 and that word doesn't exist...maybe you meant pedantic?
I'll leave all future admonishments to the moderators as you should with your abuse.
Maybe I could have toned my words down a little but in the end I answered the question and provided another possible source of information the way i see it.
Boring but never padantic.
cheers
B...OZ
Re: o/t Re: jordan H/C
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 10:26 am
by Shaun?
Those who believe what they read in the Sport
Re: o/t Re: jordan H/C
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 11:25 am
by Peter Mandleson
The minimum wage! I think that has been a Labour policy for 70 years!
Re: o/t Re: jordan H/C
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 4:15 pm
by jj
You can't get much more 'minimum' than what I've been earning for the last 70 years......
Re: o/t Re: jordan H/C
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 4:17 pm
by jj
Ignore him: he's a Spurt reader, after all..........