Page 2 of 3
David
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:23 am
by andy at handiwork
Dont hold your breath.
Re: Some more stuff....
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:35 am
by jimslip
This will have you howling with laughter:
The Tip of the Iceberg Pt 1 & 2
And you'll be splitting your sides at this:
In spite of the likes of you vomiting on anyone who dares question authority, over 700,000 people have chosen to seek out and watch this. Of course they are all deluded!
Angrier and angrier
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:08 am
by David Johnson
"In spite of the likes of you vomiting on anyone who dares question authority, over 700,000 people have chosen to seek out and watch this. Of course they are all deluded!"
I merely asked a question. No need to get a cob on, Jimbo!
The thread will remind you yet again what the question was.
Cheers
D
Andy
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:09 am
by David Johnson
!wink!
Okay Jimbo
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:44 am
by David Johnson
I'm sorry you got very upset at being asked a question about your views.
Surely you could have just said "David, I can't answer your question" or "No, I don't want to answer your question. I feel much more comfortable posting links to Youtube which have nothing to do with the question that you ask".
Fair enough. It just seems very sad that you get so angry and insulting when anyone who disagrees with you, asks a question.
I will leave you to it, so hopefully you will calm down.
Cheers
D
Re: Do you want to be a millionaire?
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 9:48 am
by frankthring
Jim, I watched with interest all your links. You are right to be untrustful of
Govts. But there is a fine line between being a sceptic and being paranoid.
Your Cuban story is about something that did not happen but might have
done (whereas the Reichstag fire and 1939 German excuses for invading
Poland are now well-proved examples of events done by a bad Govt).....
The Osama story and 911 stories are interesting. My problem with them
is that they are as bad tale-telling as the "lies" they wish to crush because
only with reasoned debate between opposing views placed on record at
the same time can anything like an intelligent opinion be reached !! And for
every conspiracy theory on 911, from structual damage to the general plot
there are fairly reasoned opposing views. Presenting one side of a case
my dear friend actually proves nothing ! To hear both sides in reasoned
debate is something else and of value.
Re: Do you want to be a millionaire?
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:39 am
by Arginald Valleywater
Sorry I thought this was a thread about recruiting future Labor MPs? Being a millionaire and going to an expensive school are now mandatory.
Arginald
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 12:47 pm
by David Johnson
Not for the Labour leader, Ed Miliband.
He went to a comprehensive.
Cheers
D
Re: Do you want to be a millionaire?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:54 am
by videokim
We (me & John) watched a documentary on the Twin Towers that also said their destruction was down to controlled explosives, they had some of the best engineers in the world giving their advice & expertise in explosions.
2 weeks before the Towers fell the underground car park was shut off & witnesses saw heavy vehicles going into the building all hours of the day.
Each experts gave their opion on what they thought of the way the buildings fell & each one said the same that it was controlled not accidental.
Also what they said was that the real target wasn't the Towers but the FBI headquarters nearby that held records of the governments debts etc, a policeman told how he got a call telling him to leave the building minutes before it came down.
The fireman went to the FBI building 30 minutes before it fell as there were reports it was on fire, they saw no fire as didn't the police officer yet amazingly like the Twin Towers this building also fell down quite neatly like the other 2 but to the stress of the US government shit loads of important data had been lost..insurance job or what?
Jim is on the right lines with his theories & like Princess Di being killed for having a relationship with a Muslim we will never know.
Kim
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:17 am
by David Johnson
Let's assume that what you say in your post is absolutely correct.
Why then should the Americans invade Afghanistan of all places, one of the poorest countries in the world with no oil etc etc and spend 10 years there?
If they went to all the bother of killing thousands of their own citizens, why not then use it as an excuse to invade a wealthy, resource-rich country soon after rather than Afghanistan.
Cheers
D