egafd.com

If I didnt know better, this ban porn thing has come at a time when there is a purge on kiddy fiddlers from 20 to 30 years ago. I think all this is a smokescreen tothe real issue that someone really big hasnt been caught yet and I know his names on everybodys lips because I gasped with disbeleif when i heard and nor shall I say it because its based on unfounded rumour

Lets just say my big brain is ticking over time on this and cant help but entertain all this tlak about banning porn is a big distraction but will never happen because ultimately, it aint that big a deal and they dont want it becoming illegal again because thats why it was made legal in the first place.

They couldnt stop it before the internet and they certainly will try but wont stop it even if they shut down every single website

People are too wily to alow that. they tried to shut down ********* and MegaUpload but they came back and still doing business sharing and facilitating copyright infringement

This proposed 'ban all forms of pornography in the media, including the digital field' - does this include gay porn, or only porn that features women in it?

a m playlist wrote:

> This proposed 'ban all forms of pornography in the media,
> including the digital field' - does this include gay porn, or
> only porn that features women in it?


Surely "all forms of pornography" is self explanatory.

JamesW wrote:


> Surely "all forms of pornography" is self explanatory.
>

But this is the EU remember. I was pretty sure this was a joke, as the EU would actually have come up wit a plan to ban *heterosexual* porn.

JamesW wrote:

> a m playlist wrote:
>
> > This proposed 'ban all forms of pornography in the media,
> > including the digital field' - does this include gay porn, or
> > only porn that features women in it?
>
>
> Surely "all forms of pornography" is self explanatory.

If you read the first link article, the driving force of this proposed bill is to call for the establishment of regulatory agencies with 'a mandate to impose effective sanctions on companies and individuals promoting the sexualisation of girls.' Apparently the cornerstone of these proposals is that porn violates the rights of both women who appear in it and children who are exposed to it - no mention about the men who appear in porn, or the sexualisation of boys.

Personally, I get tired of hearing/reading these proposals to impose a nanny state on all of us because some adults with dependent off-springs are rubbish at parenting - i.e. don't have the guts or the will to impose a structure and discipline on their kids in such matters.

JamesW wrote:
>
>
> Surely "all forms of pornography" is self explanatory.
>
planeterotica wrote:

That is a very narrow thought surely ?

Oh shit...Does that mean we all gotta start having lives, finding partners and settling down now???

Apparently the cornerstone of these proposals is that porn violates the rights of both women who appear in it and children who are exposed to it - no mention about the men who appear in porn, or the sexualisation of boys.


That one is nipped in the bud right there. Most companies regulate themselves to comply with 2257 and billing regulations.

I've not heard violated women signing model releases for being violated and the adult industry is not responsible for how children see it in their homes if their parents cant be bothered to supervise them. There are controls already in place for them to use effectively without seeing it

Rather than have a tit for tat war that gets either side no where we should have a summit meeting with the government and educate them as to what really goes on in our business and how best to deal with it

Or we can carry on kicking each other in the shins like a couple of doddery old men and get nowhere

one eyed jack wrote:

> If I didnt know better, this ban porn thing has come at a time
> when there is a purge on kiddy fiddlers from 20 to 30 years
> ago. I think all this is a smokescreen tothe real issue that
> someone really big hasnt been caught yet and I know his names
> on everybodys lips because I gasped with disbeleif when i heard
> and nor shall I say it because its based on unfounded rumour
>
His name is not on everybody's lips because I, for one, have absolutely no idea who you are referring to.

william wrote:

> For as long as there is a need then there will be away to
> satisfy that urge - people will find away to access porn either
> electronically or through other means.
>
> What porn is being banned ? Or will we see the return of
> censored porn like the japanese ? Oh and china barring porn -
> yes it can in some ways but not all of it is filterable -
> encrypted business lines you can proxy through and get it like
> any site you can access here - you just have to know how to do
> it and have the right access - much like the middle east barred
> but still you can access through firewalls and such if you know
> the way - good mate works out of china 4 months of the year and
> he has been able to access when he wants.
>
But how many people would know how to do that? A few sure but most would not have a clue how to "proxy through encrypted business lines". I don't even understand what that means.