Page 2 of 2

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2002 5:53 pm
by Crimpo
pornrumors - well its good to see they aren't still just sticking to their own cut and pastes and tedious links to escort sites - ah how can Luke Ford (for surely it is he) have sunk so low...

Vida and Michelle - both astounding in my view...

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2002 6:41 pm
by m.t
please note xxxmichellethorne.com has NO connection with michelle thorne and is NOT endorsed by michelle thorne the only offical site is

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2002 7:47 pm
by Chrispornstar
Synthetic, sexless porndoll. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Spot-on yet again Dibble!

Re: Beatles more popular than God

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2002 7:53 pm
by Chrispornstar
Nah! The Great Lennon mis-quote was that they were more popular than Jesus. And in 1965 they probably were. But not in 1975 were they more popular than The Bay City Rollers, which is probably closer to the Garman-Thorne comparison!

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2002 7:54 pm
by Pierre
What's all this comparison crap? Just be grateful that all these gorgeous, scrumtious women do what they do and make us chaps (and a few females) very happy...that's ALL that really matters eh?

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2002 2:33 am
by carl
utter arse. i'd take michelle anyday over vidal, or whatever his name is.

Re: Beatles more popular than God

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2002 9:15 am
by jj
It was the sixties, remember? And if you can remember them....
......aside from the vexed issue of the Triune nature of the Judaeo-Christian deity, I can't quite get the BCR analogy.
Les McKeown/Vida? Nah...........

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2002 1:51 pm
by Cumstoppe
Mines too