Page 2 of 3

Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:43 pm
by alec
Thanks, but you'll have to remind me of your previous, sorry.

Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:30 pm
by chiavatorcortese
I can post, but they add nothing to the other pics in EGAFD from the same set

[IMG]http://img249.imagevenue.com/loc120/th_02944_AB_001_123_120lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img209.imagevenue.com/loc410/th_02973_AB_002_123_410lo.jpg[/IMG]

But that must be clear: I'm not proposing that Mira and Elke are the same girl; I just say that the girl of Private set in my pics and in some EGAFD pictures could be the same girl of the EGAFD caps from "That's Life"; my hypothesis is that or the girl in "That's Life" is not Mira, but Elke; or that the Private girl is not Elke, but Mira. In other words I hypotize a mistake in EGAFD, not an identifiction between Mira and Elke. But I am not so confident in my physiognomic ability


Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:37 pm
by chiavatorcortese
physionomic !blush!


Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:13 pm
by jj
Maria Papp and Mary Eleniak are different girls.


Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:14 pm
by jj
I only spotted it too late.


Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:26 pm
by jj
Physiognomic : -))


Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:29 pm
by jj
chiavatorcortese wrote:
> I just say that the girl of Private set in
> my pics and in some EGAFD pictures could be the same girl of
> the EGAFD caps from "That's Life";
Ah, I see now. Sorry, the 'TL' girl is Mira with her early-period
blonde rinse. For a start Elke is much bustier and has a 'beauty-
spot' mole that has bee airbrushed out in those Private shots.


Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:30 pm
by jj
Sorrry- you were right first time : -)


Re: Blondie

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:51 pm
by chiavatorcortese
Thank you: I was induced in this hypercorrectivism 'cause in italian "fisiognomico" would be actually a mistake: it is not the adjective of "fisionomia" = "physiognomy", "appearance", but of the noun "fisiognomica", that is this; the right adjective of "fisionomia" is just "fisionomico"

About Mira and Elke: I'm sure you are right; but it's hard to believe, judging from the little square of my first pic, that Elke could be "bustier" than anyone !grin!


Re: Blondie

Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:38 am
by jj
chiavatorcortese wrote:
> Thank you: I was induced in this hypercorrectivism 'cause in
> italian "fisiognomico" would be actually a mistake: it is not
> the adjective of "fisionomia" = "physiognomy", "appearance",
> but of the noun "fisiognomica", that is this; the right adjective
of "fisionomia" is just "fisionomico"

So the Italian has two spellings? Interesting..... I guess that the
shorter form is a later rationalisation of spellng, a little along
the lines of US-English 'color', which ignores the secondary origin
via Norman French [couleur] and [re-]references the original
Romance/Latin color. I love English so much because it tends
to retain the etymological history of so many loan-words.



> About Mira and Elke: I'm sure you are right; but it's hard to
> believe, judging from the little square of my first pic, that
> Elke could be "bustier" than anyone !

She's quite a 'stocky' girl, whereas Mira is relatively slender.