egafd.com

That's the trouble; where to draw the line.
For me, if a film's shot in Europe, with a pretty much Euro cast
[exceptional examples being, say Tracy Adams, or Sean Michaels];
and a Euro director, then it qualifies. It helps if it has a subsequent,
retitled, Euro release.
I more or less apply a '50% rule'.

But let's not try for some unattainable ideal : -)

If we follow the nationality criterion, then this girl (as European) should definitively be included, but since the territoriality of the film leads to Japan, she should eventually be excluded...!confused! This said, the fact that we already have a precedent with the Japanese titles featuring Euro girls must lead to her inclusion in EGAFD.

FWIW, I have always been a supporter of a more "global" approach for databases of EGAFD's credibility (for ex. on the occasion of including the precious vintage Turkish porn titles of 1979-1980) and I would most certainly encourage contributors of Bad Samaritan's expertise to let us profit of the results of their researches! !drink!

Thank you skatschko for your analytical and eventually supportive approach.

To carry this discussion on another yet supplementary platform; I recently submitted to alec info and screenshots regarding a film (I guess it will take about four months for him to consider this !oops!), which is a Brazilian production but it's shot in Europe, all the actresses are ones already listed on EGAFD, and the director is also European!

Good old jj, once it was the two sides of the Atlantic but the phenomenon commonly dubbed as 'globalisation' necessarily affects and will further affect pornographic industry/cinema.

Additionally, as a product of my premature sense of humour: European girls' appearances in Japanese pornography may also be deemed an 'orientation' since Japan etymologically means orient. !clown!

An interesting note to add to this 'trend' is a website I discovered today. A Spanish website in the English language, featuring a Colombian girl, yet registered in Cyprus!