egafd.com

Thanks a lot.

jj wrote:

> manifest discomfort about showing her 'enhancements';

If she is Anna [12], I'm not surprised. It's amazing how many of these 'enhancements' ('enlargements' would be a more accurate and neutral word) place the nipples unrealistically high. If the unlikely event of breast feeding was ever attempted, the baby would have to be held upside down over the shoulder.

This is not so much a criticism of the girls as of the plastic surgeons BTW. I wonder if any of them read forums like this.

alec wrote:
> Thanks a lot.
It's better I put the prelim. notes here where I can find them again rather than
on a scrap of paper which I will- of course- inevitably mislay : -)


> ... It's amazing how many of these 'enhancements' ('enlargements' would be a more
> accurate and neutral word) place the nipples unrealistically high.
And they so often seem to be [re]placed asymmetrically.... with eyesight as poor
as that it's a wonder these butchers are allowed to do surgery at all. And doesn't
euphemism usually imply lack of confidence in the product- or of its morality?


> If the unlikely event of breast feeding was ever
> attempted, the baby would have to be held upside down over the shoulder.
... leading to another case of the notorious 'Octopus Complex'.