egafd.com

HUGELY impressive gal : -))

Yes, I quickly formed the impression that he was a deeply unpleasant person.
Howsoever, he wouldn't be alone in that, in this biz, and I've never been out
for a drink with him.

The beach and skimpy clothing

Think I might start collecting film covers

[IMG]http://thumbnails50.imagebam.com/17387/fcc2d7173862222.jpg[/IMG]


and solo caps


[IMG]http://thumbnails51.imagebam.com/16076/4793ee160754020.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails62.imagebam.com/16076/5db3b7160754023.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails25.imagebam.com/16076/9262c3160754026.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://thumbnails64.imagebam.com/16076/e33d8f160754029.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails63.imagebam.com/16076/80daa9160754032.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails42.imagebam.com/16076/3f79ed160754034.jpg[/IMG]

Woodman can talk his way into almost any girl's pants and asses, that's why he keeps on doing it.

And because of that "skill" he launched hundreds if not thousands of East European Hotties into porn.

For that reason alone people shouldn't whine about Woodman.

That said strictly from the Casting tape point of view. Even with the sat down camera angle and the low production value, some of those scenes are way hotter than big bucks porn productions. Watch the casting of Anetta Keys for instance.

However it all comes down to a matter of personal opinion.
Call me crazy but I actually enjoy more watching the balding, tubby, hairybacked Pierre Woodman fucking a young hotness in an hotel room than
a younger more aesthetically pleasing Timo Hardy. Simply because Timo's cock is the size of a small infant's arm. As I'd rather watch some average Joe fuck a West Coast cutie pie than Manuel Ferrara chocking and spitting.

So I don't see why complaining since no one forces you to watch what you don't like.

Maybe next year or in ten there's going to be a fresh new "asshole whisperer" that will be able to peel those young babes panties and get them on board to get pounded in the ass on camera better than PW.
Until then we're pretty much stuck with Woodman and I don't mind.

I think it comes to a question of pure vanity, when porn directors feel entltled to fondle and fuck the female talent.
Well, I for one don't enjoy watching Woodman, Ron Jeremy or Robert Malone fuck in front of the camera, no matter that they or their fans may say they are "legends".
True, I don't have to watch the movies they make or star in. Nonetheles, how many films I personally would I have enjoyed more, or have preferred seen a favorite actress when she was being screwed by these individuals?
We can praise the looks and enthusiam of a particular porn actress, but we are NOT allowed to criticize the male talent? We are not permitted to complain?

>Yawgmoth said:
Woodman can talk his way into almost any girl's pants and asses, that's why he keeps on doing it.

And because of that "skill" he launched hundreds if not thousands of East European Hotties into porn.

That's like saying Ron Jeremy has that "same" seductive "skill".
In PW's case he opens a wallet and pays an actress/model to perform a sex act (with him or with others). Does he easily ensnare other similar lovelies should he go to a nightclub incognito in a small town in Hungary and get the same result, if no one has a clue who he is and if he does not let on who he is? I wonder.
(He keeps on doing it as you say because he probably can't do anything else, the money keeps rolling in, and he is able to pay for the girls. Would they really fuck him for free, with no strings attached?).
As for Jeremy, does he boast about fucking nice lovely young girls (when the average Jo Blow can only dream about) because he is so "studly" and a real good fuck, or because a director has paid the girl to do it?

It's great to see a dissenting opinion. That's what free speech is all about.

That said: yes, you're crazy : -)

who doesnt like to see their niece doing uncle fester

[IMG]http://thumbnails55.imagebam.com/17505/291299175040118.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails43.imagebam.com/17505/104ea4175040120.jpg[/IMG]

The WD series reminds me all too much of first few episodes of ben dover except it has the most ridiculous question and answer dubbed interviews I've ever heard

I've come to the conclusion their complete bullshit just as a magazine editor makes up any number of stories about the models featured

When you see girls like karina above introduced as a virgin who then does anal easily...just makes it that much more ordinary if thats possible

Deuce, that is why when people first see one of those casting scenes/movies, they get taken in by what appears to be "natural" performances.
For instance, that these moderls/girls just show up for just a casting where they only have to remove their clothes, and then easily agree to engage in sex (with Woodman?). All this without a HIV test, that would be logical to have obtained at that point.
Then as you have pointed out, that the girl would just as easily (and effortlessly) engage in anal sex, just by by the simple and soft request by PW?

If only we didnt know what we know we might enjoy it more....lol

Interesting on several of his casting videos the girls are done by other studs and not him...Demia Moor & Gabriella Bond spring to mind

[IMG]http://thumbnails51.imagebam.com/17506/63b4fa175058394.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails54.imagebam.com/17506/8a470b175058399.jpg[/IMG]

The big one that got away Sandy aka Zsanette Egerhasi

So his powers of persusasion arent always omnipotent











An ageing performer is just that and when you couple them with a young fresh nubile it really doesnt work all that well particualrly if you've seen her with younger experienced studs



I think about the only guy that might be around the mark in their 40s
would be the likes of Marino aka Super Mario because the guys looks about 25

Once you've seen the same scenario played out a dozen times you know the score