egafd.com

I don't know whether you are now through with the all the necessary modifications
regarding this title.
There is just one item you need to look into, and that is Kerry.
She is still listed as: ?Kerry [3] non-sex
Kerry fully participates in that 3-way (bj, vaginal, etc).

Len801 wrote:
> I don't know whether you are now through with the all the
> necessary modifications regarding this title.
Somehow I doubt that.... and theres' still the issue of "Alice Romain".


> There is just one item you need to look into, and that is Kerry.
Mea culpa.... you know I have to be hit with a sledgehammer before the
task finally gets done.

I'm glad to be past it, though; I've watched a few of those Sal 're-fighting
WWII' ones recently - and the massive interludes, washed-out colours and
endless procession of seedy old farts getting their tiny limp todgers attended
to by a procession of near-anonymous Eurotarts is not a little depressing.
Is it too much to ask, for a little less joylessness?

Believe me it was a real task watching the likes of Micoli (he has been around for at least a
decade, and as far as I know basically appearing in Salieri movies, always in non-sex roles, and
sleazy ones to boot. Does he have a day job? I mean I hope he just doesn't wait around
hoping Salieri keeps coming up with meaty non-sex roles to play), Don Fernando and the silent and
dead-pan Brummer toil away. And always in those depressing grey colored "dungeon" settings?

I would really like to have an amateur psychiatrist tear some of these opuses apart for deep meanings.
Well, I did notice one curious thing (well perhaps two), at least Natacha was chosen for her artistic
talents if nothing else in her non-sex role. She really did seem to be an authentic ballerina.
The other thing was that Salieri removed a lot of the suspense regarding Lorenzo's ruthless and sleazy
relationship with his loving wife. The smirk on his face after he tells Sofia that he is
essentially "bankrupt" and will lose his business. So get this, he frequently uses and must spend a pretty sum
to use Silvia's brothel, but has to resort to have Sofia prostitute herself so he can earn money
off of her (up to an including blackmail to keep her in that situation). And then of course consider Silvia. She is
as sleazy as they come, but when she talks to Don Fernando and Micoli, she is "repulsed" and is openly "hostile"
to the way they conduct themselves. Is she really marveling or astonished that there are more scheming and evil
characters out there that really outshine her?

I often have to remind myself that we have to add not only the smut we
enjoy, or approve of : -)
We have to cater, too, to fans of dirty feet, rampant misogyny, terrible acting,
wafer-thin plotlines, faked cumshots, awful camera-work, appalling direction,
94-year-old actors, untrimmed toenails and a thousand other horrors.

Sorry to keep adding info to this thread and title.
Did some search on the web. It would appear the web release of full title (not just
scenes) was in late 2012, and from what I could reconstruct (and perhaps it may be or may not be correct)
the DVD French release followed by Colmax with their version "L'?pouse des autres" and later ATV released on DVD in Italy
under the different title LA SPOSA ABUSATA.

jj wrote:


> You'd have to ask our 'Ferreting out obscure pics from esoteric
> sources"
> department.

Did someone call my name?

You have to know that there are two different Salieri sites: http://www.salierixxx.com and http://www.mariosalieri.it.

Natacha Hariris is not listed on the first, but she is listed on the second right here. Her picture -- apparently both on EGAFD and IAFD -- was taken from that page.

Thanks Walter.
I knew it was not a screencap frm the scene. It had to be a production photo.
Salieri only lists that movie title for her. She must have been chosen solely for her ballet
skills, and perhaps did not want to perform any on-screen sex.

Walter Burns wrote:
> Did someone call my name?

Yep. The Bat-phone seemed to be on the fritz : -)

Len801 wrote:
> Sorry to keep adding info to this thread and title.

It would have been a lot easier to process if you'd put the two main posts
together.

J.J. said
>It would have been a lot easier to process if you'd put the two main posts
together.

Sorry I don't follow you. Together in what sense? Which two main posts? How?

When I work on a movie, I have (and post) some initial info, and depending on what I
subsequently find or what is discussed I add it on later.
EGAFD does not allow subsequent editing of posts so you are basically stuck with what is there.