OEJ, I thought it was Omar who did the quick escape out the back door... well, he does in every one of his movies I've seen!
And no Gary Glitter? Most of the 'young people' who post here don't even know who he is, they just think it's Cockney Rhyming Slang...
The Police are still watching you!
Key Word "Fetish"
For all we know this could have been very heavy SM stuff. That might be why the rozzers poked thier snouts in.
Re: The Police are still watching you!
Most 'young people' I speak to, don't know who Neil Armstong is and worse,don't care!...the future is NOT bright..oh dear!
Re: The Police are still watching you!
sexplorer wrote:
>
> >Eduardo
>
> I'm sure that law enforcement authorities in the UK observe
> those websites that they deem perversely unfit. But could
> that even mean BGAFD !!
i would say not. police resources are currently so over-stretched that indivduals they KNOW to be trading in paedophile images, may never be brought to book. a site such as this one not going to be on their list of priorities. in fact, it's not going to be on any list, full stop!
> David Blunkett has now made it a criminal offence to send
> Emails containing ultra-obscene sexual references.
i suspect this is a reference to government guidelines introduced in the regulation of investigatory powers bill, which allows employers to monitor the emails of their employees:
in other words, it has no bearing upon the private correspondence of individuals.
>
> >Eduardo
>
> I'm sure that law enforcement authorities in the UK observe
> those websites that they deem perversely unfit. But could
> that even mean BGAFD !!
i would say not. police resources are currently so over-stretched that indivduals they KNOW to be trading in paedophile images, may never be brought to book. a site such as this one not going to be on their list of priorities. in fact, it's not going to be on any list, full stop!
> David Blunkett has now made it a criminal offence to send
> Emails containing ultra-obscene sexual references.
i suspect this is a reference to government guidelines introduced in the regulation of investigatory powers bill, which allows employers to monitor the emails of their employees:
in other words, it has no bearing upon the private correspondence of individuals.
Re: The Police are still watching you!
I suspect this was swallow-my.com - mostly scat and period stuff.
Incidentally, Magoo - how would you define "very heavy SM"?
Keith
Incidentally, Magoo - how would you define "very heavy SM"?
Keith
Re: The Police are still watching you!
Sorry for the delay in replying Keith.
The police still prosecute scat and period stuff. I am not saying wether they are right or wrong in doing so but that stuff is still well beyond R18 or even most continental non certificate stuff. And whilst some of us are pissed off that mild spanking and squirting and pissing are still cut I suspect it will be a long time before that stuff that you mentioned is legal.
How do I define heavy SM? Well I would start by saying needles inserted through flesh, drawing of blood, painfull beatings, choking to the point of vomiting, use of electric shocks etc. Need I go on?
And now that I have explained my definition Keith, would you care to share your opinions on this sort of stuff?
The police still prosecute scat and period stuff. I am not saying wether they are right or wrong in doing so but that stuff is still well beyond R18 or even most continental non certificate stuff. And whilst some of us are pissed off that mild spanking and squirting and pissing are still cut I suspect it will be a long time before that stuff that you mentioned is legal.
How do I define heavy SM? Well I would start by saying needles inserted through flesh, drawing of blood, painfull beatings, choking to the point of vomiting, use of electric shocks etc. Need I go on?
And now that I have explained my definition Keith, would you care to share your opinions on this sort of stuff?
Re: The Police are still watching you!
Thanks for responding, Magoo. I wasn't having a go btw, just interested in understanding what people interpret as "heavy SM".
My opinions on it? Well I've aired them here before to some extent in that I tnink there is a lot of misunderstanding of SM and a lot of misinformation as well, partly through lousy representation in SM pornography. Your own use of language is interesting since it rather luridly describes a number of things that are done that would be described in the BDSM scene as "edge-play", but that are not actually that uncommon. The only ones that are pretty no-go areas for me are the deliberate drawing of blood, and choking to the point of vomiting. I have an ethic (as do many others) of "Safe, Sane and Consensual".
I should set my stall out I suppose. I am what they call a BDSM "life-styler". I run a number of BDSM events, including an educational organisation and I am a little evangelistic in trying to break down some of that mis-information.
But this has now strayed off-topic, and has little relevance here.
I'd be happy to take it to private e-mail if you want to discuss it further.
Regards,
Keith
My opinions on it? Well I've aired them here before to some extent in that I tnink there is a lot of misunderstanding of SM and a lot of misinformation as well, partly through lousy representation in SM pornography. Your own use of language is interesting since it rather luridly describes a number of things that are done that would be described in the BDSM scene as "edge-play", but that are not actually that uncommon. The only ones that are pretty no-go areas for me are the deliberate drawing of blood, and choking to the point of vomiting. I have an ethic (as do many others) of "Safe, Sane and Consensual".
I should set my stall out I suppose. I am what they call a BDSM "life-styler". I run a number of BDSM events, including an educational organisation and I am a little evangelistic in trying to break down some of that mis-information.
But this has now strayed off-topic, and has little relevance here.
I'd be happy to take it to private e-mail if you want to discuss it further.
Regards,
Keith
Re: The Police are still watching you!
Its not really my scene Keith but I would not criticise others for being into SM providing as you say it is done safely and consensually.
I can understand what people get from it but it does nothing for me. I would defend peoples rights to express thier sexuality in any way they want providing it harms nobody.
I can understand what people get from it but it does nothing for me. I would defend peoples rights to express thier sexuality in any way they want providing it harms nobody.