Re: Familien Sex 6: additional informations
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 1:55 pm
deezer wrote:
> jj wrote:
> >>If you're saying they were actually drunk, then that's what
> you should have said. If they're only playing drunk, then that should be
> made clear.
> Don't blame Johray1 for that. It was me, deezer:-))
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@deezer: Thanks for your support!
And, I didn't think that little joke would cause such misgivings... !hmmm!
To me it's like that: !teacher!
If Bea & Tom are at least average actors besides the "adult-stuff" they will
make one believe they are actually drunk, even if sober like a new-born, right?!
One might think nothing else but: They are ONLY ACTING drunk, right?!
I think we could easily agree on that...
If they appeared as "unsuitably" drunk, one would have to remain silent for
not entering the odd world of "Speculation" ... Right?!
And so I thought of no flaw in deezer's initial-review and of none concerning
my "postcard--joke"...
> jj wrote:
> >>If you're saying they were actually drunk, then that's what
> you should have said. If they're only playing drunk, then that should be
> made clear.
> Don't blame Johray1 for that. It was me, deezer:-))
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@deezer: Thanks for your support!
And, I didn't think that little joke would cause such misgivings... !hmmm!
To me it's like that: !teacher!
If Bea & Tom are at least average actors besides the "adult-stuff" they will
make one believe they are actually drunk, even if sober like a new-born, right?!
One might think nothing else but: They are ONLY ACTING drunk, right?!
I think we could easily agree on that...
If they appeared as "unsuitably" drunk, one would have to remain silent for
not entering the odd world of "Speculation" ... Right?!
And so I thought of no flaw in deezer's initial-review and of none concerning
my "postcard--joke"...
