Re: XNK5337=XNK2373
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:09 pm
Thanks.
Even with those caps there doesn't seem to be enough to warrant more
than the notes already added.
If anyone else chips in with more evidence/opinion, we'll review.
Even with those caps there doesn't seem to be enough to warrant more
than the notes already added.
If anyone else chips in with more evidence/opinion, we'll review.