egafd.com

One is pretty, one is not.

hmmm,
Maybe not a pretty face but a horny body

deezer wrote:

> There are some similarities. Maybe a very early appearance?
> Sophie @ iafd is
> Sopie
> [16]
>
> Unfortunately we can't see xnk's teeth's in mix's caps.
> The gap between Sophie's upper incisors is very characteristic.

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Felt the urge to comment on XNK8330


being probably a young Sophie [16]


but then I rather enjoyed some sunshine than
facing some utterly german weather.

Peacefulness is a high good, at least in MHO.
!nerd!

If we had a shot of 8330 with eyes open...

jj is right that Sophie is an ugly hag. But that would explain the difference with the years.

You asked which girl/scene. You'd know if you used threaded view . It makes it easier to read (like reddit), so not everthing has be quoted.

Girl meant was http://www.egafd.com/actresses/details.php/id/x08330
(Scene 1).

It would be great if you can do caps of scene 1 with
1. Eyes open
2. Showing some teeth - ideally upper front teeth.

THX!

found: (update vcl

mix wrote:

> found: (update vcl



Thanks! Definitely not Sophie [16].

For comparison Sophie in an unknown scene:

mix wrote:

> found: (update vcl
-----------------------------

Great you found those "Girl Infos"...

They also display the influence Dorian McGray had on early Horny Heaven
productions.
Even more than the (rare) use of this logo.

Btw: Can you somehow tell who is who on this?

(The left/right appearance of girls on such pics doesn't always mean
left = 1st girl (would be Eva) right = 2nd girl (would be Jeany)

If the scene is hosted the girls might be introduced, or introducing themselves.

Yay!