Page 2 of 2

Re: Nadia - Andrea Spinks...

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:42 am
by puretotty
We have worked with both Belle and Kate Austin on other projects, and dont really feel either are right, plus possibly would conflict with the companies we worked with them for...

Alas Tiffany Rose didnt work out, due to me beign silly and thinkign she was UK based, alas thats not the case... Well my search continues, alas time not on my side as shooting on Wednesday....

There is a absolute stunner called Carmen who is on www.hardcorehoneyz.com but not sure if she is exclusive to them as never seen her on any modelling site...

Anyone know any good links to sites that rep adult models... looked already on Walpole Group and also the one Kate Autin was on... :O(

Steve

Re: Here's a girl 4 u

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:23 pm
by MegaTon

Re: Here's a girl 4 u

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:39 pm
by puretotty
Agreed :O) Have mailed her twice but no reply as of yet, my only concern is she is quite busty and the other girl isnt... well not flat mind you a 36C so yes maybe they would work well... just hope Kate gets back in touch, and works up to hardcore girl girl...

Steve

Re: Here's a girl 4 u...even better one!

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:05 pm
by MegaTon

Re: Nadia - Andrea Spinks...

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:38 pm
by PR Models Ltd
please have a look at and especially the models folios section

Cheers

/Patrick


Re: Nadia - Andrea Spinks...

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:00 pm
by puretotty
Well I found the girl I want, just got to work out who she is ??? Hope soemone can help ???

http://modelgirlfriends.com/images/bann ... C00508.jpg


the girl in the middle being held up ?

http://modelgirlfriends.com/images/bann ... C00509.jpg


Hope someone can help, sorry quality of scan is pretty crap !

Thanks

Steve

Re: Nadia - Andrea Spinks...

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 10:45 am
by doyleonly
Isn't she still working under the name Pixie?

http://www.pinkpornstars.com/galleries/pixie0.php

Re: Nadia - Andrea Spinks...

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:56 pm
by woodgnome
no.