egafd.com

Corona

Not one person has posted in favour of "Frames" ... Get the hint and change your site... You are not designing for yourself but for others...

We have made constructive criticism and so you should take it as such. You came on here posting about your film and you've seen the replies..

Not one person has said "WOW"...

Itfilm

I tried changing my res to 1024 by 768 and it looked a lot clearer on my 17" but being an old man with failing eye sight.. Everything was just a bit too small for my eyes.

Another point I have to make is, not many of the major sites (not adult) on the net need scrolling. When I see that I need to scroll on most of them, I'll change to higher res. The saying is "If it ain't broke... Don't fix it "

I use a Sony VX2100 which shoots at a higher resolution than the current DVD standard, although the higher resolution copies are handy for the future, for blue ray for example (if that ever takes off) and of course DivX, when broadband speeds really pick up.

corona wrote:

> I am a designer, my productions are very designed, so maybe
> like minded people who like the Doobedoo way will expect to see
> such a site at the resolution it is.
>

http://www.elite-designers.co.uk/

Is this one yours as well?

Dropped it down to 2 frames and made the top framw small. Guess it works quite well and should suit most resolutions.

Thanks for the comments.

haha, nope, nothing to do with me

The stills on Film now expand to full size, takes longer to load although the results look better.