Page 2 of 3
Re: Television-x
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 5:36 pm
by Mr Whippy
I have recently cancelled subs to both TVX/TAC.
They are churning out masses of repeats and American softcore tripe.
Two new shows on TAC last week were abyssmal, Slutty Brides was a shockingly cheap product, very little action and much too much crap acting while Valencia Diaz was wasted in the new interactive show.
Obvioulsy filmed for Spice Platinum in a harder version we seemed to get a few flashes of breast, little or no pbues and a couple of minutes of her left, all be it very pert, buttock!!
Have the Sat channels been told to soften up their output? The new Spice Extrem is exactly the opposite, cut to pieces French
and the same for other shows..............
Re: Television-x
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 5:50 pm
by joe king
I would try to get in contact with workinglunch
Maybe they can get you more action. If this program gets more complaints about credit-cards subscriptions and the 'poor' service from Televisionx then more people would be helped in getting some kind of justice.
Re: Television-x
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 9:47 pm
by Bill Malone
Sorry to hear you're having problems, robster, but...
LET THIS BE A WARNING TO YOU ALL!
TVX = SOFT CORE. You can see more nudity by standing naked in front of a mirror. The freeviews are exactly what you get when you subscribe except they go on all night.
Re: Television-x
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 6:24 am
by Jason
While I agree in part with what you are saying everyone seems to be missing the point - when you sign up you sign a legally binding contract for 12 months.
Whats the point in having contracts if you can cancel them willy nilly? The moral of the story is: buyer beware! Read the fucking small print...
Jason
Re: Television-x
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 7:47 am
by nudger
Given the nature of the product and the fact that porn still remains a relatively taboo subject in the uk, they probably exploit the fact that very few people are going to kick up a stink in public for fear of "what the neighbours might say" (or the wife for that matter!). Appears underhand at best, but they don't appear to be doing themselves any favours in front of a lot of potential subscribers here.
Re: Television-x
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 11:39 am
by Cringemaker
"It gets harder after encryption", is the Number One big lie.
Re: Television-x
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 1:02 pm
by Frank
Of course one should read the small print but I wonder what small print those that subscribe on the phone are given to read, and if they are deemed to have signed up for twelve months without being told whether its enforcable in law.
If told they are committed.
If not told it will probalbly cost more than twelve months subscription in legal fees to get a refund.
As I said aboove send in a written cancellation now to avoid more months building up.
Re: Television-x
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 1:05 pm
by Frank
You might have wished for harder visuals in Virtual Sex with Valencia, but her acting was superb. After watching it I could even believe she likes anal!
Re: Television-x
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 1:30 pm
by Mr Whippy
Caveat Emptor, one of the fisrt things you learn in any Law course.
It means "LET THE BUYER BEWARE" in Latin.
Re: Television-x
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:02 pm
by Gordon Bennet
Not another thread on the softness of TVX/TAC. This has been discussed so many times on this forum and it's getting well stale.
Everyone knows that the UK channels are soft, especially people who post here. Why bother complaining? You can go to the links section on this site and buy videos of girls pooing into each others mouths for flip sake!!!
With so much mega hardcore available on VHS/DVD, why do so many people still post on here about the UK channels?