egafd.com

as far as i can tell, he's not referring to adoreanjali. in fact, if you read his post back, it's possible that he's already a member of her site, which is why he excludes it from his request.

the 'fleece' reference seems to be directed towards those sites which fail to give you an accurate impression of their content before you join.

oh well, there goes the neighbourhood!

re. assumptions about people being freely posted with no question - isn't that what you're doing now? sometimes it's up to you or me to make that first post, not someone else.

it would have helped if you had included these qualifications in your original post.

'joe a' is a uk resident.

'steven', afaict, is unconnected with ukindiangirls.com. perhaps he's a bona fide satisfied customer - there are a few in existence, i'm led to believe.

you object to someone posting uncorroborated assertions about a individual, by posting a bunch of your own. using your methodology, someone could justifiably accuse you of being the webmaster for adoreanjali.com - which i'm sure you're not.

Thanks woodgnome for defending my right to an opinion.
To Mr. Kali:
I could not agree more almost every Indian site on the whole net being a complete rip off. They nearly all have the same stuff, and are padded out with either latin girls or light skinned black girls which they expect we wont notice arent really Indian.

As for being the webmaster of www.ukindiangirls.com thats an outright assumption on which you have no evidence. Apart from it being totally untrue its using your brain in the same way of making assumptions as i had done about Anjali's personality. The difference being I have seen all Anjali's videos and you had read 1 post of mine. So if you wish to make assumptions like that you do have a right but then you shouldnt have minded when I did it before you.

I think Joe's site is probably the best Indian site on the web since Amazingindians.com has not been updated in a long time.
Joe's site is one of very few which actually has never seen before girls, that are not any any other site. It may be more expensive but thats because its a AVS site and you are nto just paying for access to that, you get access to any other sites under the adultcheckgold banner.

To answer somebody's question, Joe's site is hardcore but it is currently all solo scenes with toys. No doubt this will change before long.

I dont know where the Boston link came from??
If you go to the links page of model agencies on this very site you will find a link to which is another of Joes site's where his girls are available to be hired and you can take your own video or pictures of them. And they are most definately in the UK not USA.

What I said about Anjalis personality in my previous post was my opinion and can not be proven to be right by me or wrong by others. What i said about the content of both sites are based on fact because I am simply telling you what I'd seen inside the sites.
I posted with the intention of helping someone decide before he parts with his money. I do not benefit whichever site he subscribes to or even if he chooses neither. I certainly didnt post with the intention of aggravating anyone as I seem to have done.

Wow what a lot of nonsense.
David the editor of Mayfair pointed me in the direction of this thread and as I seem to be the main topic of conversation, I thought that I should have my little say.
First and foremost I am very happy with my site. My membership is good, customers are very happy and I seem to have the support and recommendations of leading Industry players, including Mayfair. I really don't think that such well established publications would show such support unless I was doing something right.
The site itself is simply a dairy of my swinger lifestyle. You can see every update that I have uploaded by taking the tour. Yes its full on hardcore and yes there is ton of video of me taking huge cocks. Sorry for that but thats what I enjoy. Does that make me arrogant? No just real. True Joe I'm not perfect. My complexion may not be to your standards but then again I'm surprised you could focus as it was quite laughable the way you literally fell over yourself in your haste to make conversation with me at Erotica. Yes I am quite short as well. Such a crime hey Joe. I apologise for that.
To cut to the chase, my presence on the net obviously aggravates you and your alias Steven. Thats understandable but your sites are a complete irrelevance to me. You made it clear that you felt that we were in some way competitors when we met at Erotica. Trust me I do not perceive you to be a competitor.
The only opinion here that matters is that of the members. My membership is exceptionally healthy and I am very happy with my site. Are you? If so great.
A final point my site has Indian content only because I happen to a UK girl of Indian origin. As you will see the Adore brand is growing and is committed to the swinger lifestyle of good looking UK ladies and couples. All races, all colours. All real. We don't have to resort to sharking Erotica for talent. Our partners at ADORE are very willing and love the full on hardcore action of the sites. I apologise that we don't limit our sites to solo dildo play. I am obviously naive and didn't realize that solo dildo was the pinnacle of hardcore material on the web. I learn something everyday.
For instance today I have learnt that I'm arrogant. Well Joe, Steven and or whoever you happen to be for the next hour, could it be this?
Perhaps a real woman that loves to fuck and can string more than two words together may be offensive to you. Arrogant, um I wonder. But hey we are nearing the year 2003 not 1973. I'm sure your attitudes, dress sense and greasy little pony tail may be more suited to the 70's but hey Joe get a life and see reality for once.
ANJALI
www.adoreanjali.com

Hi Anjali.
I think you have missed the point a bit too.
Dont confuse me and Joe, we are 2 very seperate people who have never even met never mind be the same.
So Joe may have met you in person and will have formed his own opinion of you based upon that meeting, but from what he said further up, he hasnt seen inside your site.
I am in quite the opposite situation. I have never met you but I have seen in your site and whatever I said regarding anything to do with you or your site was simply based on that as its the only experience I have of you to form an opinion from. I'm very sure you have much bigger fish to fry than bothering wasting time on a little nobody like me. Dont get me wrong, I'm not trying to say your site is no good. Compared to other Indian paysites out there its certainly one of the very best. I was only just explaining that there is not a lot of variation in your site as far as the female interest in concerned. Thats bound to be true as the site is obviously yours and therefore focusses on you. As for my comment about the videography theres no argument to be had. Perhaps you could invest in a high quality 3-chip DV cam or similar if you are only going to have 1 camera man. That way you could extract good quality digital stills from the video itself. That means only 1 camera to worry about when the action is happening so less worry about trying to get it on 2 cameras at once.

Finally I don't see how Joe's choice of clothes bears any relevance at all. I might not think much of yours but it doesnt take away your right to excercise it. Anyway, although i was not born then, the 70s seemed like fun times. Good music, interesting colourful clothes, and intersting car designs. I have a collection of 70s cars which are admired where ever I go. If you are enjoying things from past times why get rid of them simply because time has passsed? Many people still prefer 70s porn for example.

I say to people forget others and go with what you like. And full marks to Joe for dressing how he likes. People who follow fashions (and this is not directed at anybody so dont make an issue of it please) show no sence of knowing what they like themselves. If someone likes something at one time then a few years later wouldnt be seen dead in it, then that just means that they never liked it in the first place and were just influenced by others around them rather than making their own mind up about what they like.

Anjali cannot believe the criticism you have received. My intial post was instigated after joing your site (WOW!)you wet my appetit - so to speak for british models of indian persuasion.
Keep up the good work gorgeous x

Well i gotta say what a palaver over my good friend Anjali stablemate of all the other ADORE GIRLS and a very good friend of mine...ARROGANT?? the way i saw this guy dribbling over you at EROTICA was one of the funniest things i ever seen i mean saying Anj has a skin problem is nothing really to do with her site now is it?? besides you,d have a hair problem if someone cut that pony tail off now wouldnt you??

I have known Anj for a number of years and so has my good friend and partners in crime Summer, Donna and shes never been arrogant or anything like that i can tell you what you see on her site and the other ADORE GIRLS is not only a true representation of there lifestyles but it,s REAL which is more than i can say for that crap site you have been going on about, WHO WANTS TO SEE A LADY PLAY WITH A CARROT as in the free vid clips? and belive me those videos on your site aint nothing to brag about in a word SHITE compared with Anj.

I,m just putting my personal view accross and hope this is the end of it, you dont like the ADORE concept thats fine go boil your head.pleeeeeez cos lots of people do.......i got the stats lmao to prove it. http://www.adoresummer.com

MY SITE IS: NOT .com LOL

The .com site is owned by a guy in Singapore who copied 3 of my sites page for page last year and so I bought the .net to wind him up !!!

Also... sorry for the comment about Anjali's complexion...But I did say she's a very sexy female