egafd.com

George wrote :-

Coming to the statement by Cornish Chis, I was interested to see this message, which followed soon after my original one, and which I suspect might have been connected: http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=1&i=70429&t=70429.
If it doesn't refer to CC, then I shall gladly take him at his word, and withdraw any suggestion in my original post that anybody from Cornwall might have had something to do with the spam. On the other hand, if it does refer to CC, then we can all draw our own conclusions.

For Fucks sake I can assure you 100% and I hope the moderators can confirm this I post on this forum only as Cornish Chris and never under nom-de-plumes or assumed names, I only post if either I have helpful or positive comments, and my motto is "if it aint nice, dont post".

So George in this occcasion I have decided to waive my motto as I feel somewhat got at. So big fucking deal matey you have recieved mail via your email that you posted for all to see.
I suppose if I emailed you privatly and said "cor check out the tits on this model" things would not be a problem.
But as you have recieved a mass mailing you have got on your high horse and made slanderous comments about me..Thanks.
Like Buttsie I recieve 50+ junk emails a day, offering me such diverse services as penis/breast enlargement or loans & perfume.
I simply delete and block the sender. I also recieve tons of shite via HM's Postal Service basically thats life mate.

Although I was not involved at all in Jennifer mailing BGAFD posters, I totally condone her actions and feel that she has done no wrong. Exactly why do you post your email address on your posts if it is not to recieve comments and feedback ?????

I have submitted numerous galleries ect over the last 12 months, all my own work and at my own expense, to be belittled by you has really irked me.
For a start get your facts 100% correct prior to hurling shite about, secondly wake up and smell the coffee, this is an adult board dealing with hardcore pornography, if you are so sensitive about recieving promotional email either do not post your email address or do not frequent these nasty old places.

One thing is for sure George I will make sure that when my website is due for official launch which is imminant, I will personally email you on your publically posted email address and request your humble permission to send you on of my promotional special offer emails.

Good Grief Cornish Chris

Okay point taken, but for christ sake any one would think that my webmaster had kidnapped your wife and kids, i will have a word and it will stop i promise but for the time being hit the delete key and stop worrying there are people being killed in the world, thank god thats all you have to moan about, right off to delete the 100's of spam emails i got this morning oh no what am i going to do i think the world is ending

cheer up its only porn

Jennifer

I am sure we can now close this thread. Chris, I withdraw my suggestion that the spam might have had a Cornish source, and apologise if I have impugned your good name.
George

I agree, Magoo

OK, Jennifer...but please re-read Magoos post above, and digest.

Ok fair play....but in future think before making unproven accusations.

Cheers Cornish Chris.

Sorry, Buttsie, but you're missing the point here. If we were to all hide behind false or hidden email addys, then automatically ones' posts loose a bit of credibility, surely, and people would post crap for much of the time. For posters views or opinions to really have clout, a valid email addy. gives that cred.

Officer Dibbles case was discussed heatedly ages ago, and he did use a valid addy at one point....but I really don't want to go there again.

But why post a contact email address if you don't want to recieve mail ???????

RichystrubNOSPAM@aol.com hardly inspires credibility now does it matey....you could be Tony Blair for all I know.

CC

George wrote:
> Coming to the statement by Cornish Chis, I was interested to
> see this message, which followed soon after my original one,
> and which I suspect might have been connected:
> .
> If it doesn't refer to CC, then I shall gladly take him at
> his word, and withdraw any suggestion in my original post
> that anybody from Cornwall might have had something to do
> with the spam. On the other hand, if it does refer to CC,
> then we can all draw our own conclusions.

It's a different chris entirely.

Thank you for making that clear.