Page 2 of 3
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2003 7:20 pm
by jj
Nah, Surely not JJ. Even the gentiles are "cut" in the US porn biz. Even dear old Uncle Ben had his removed due to peer pressure in the industry, which was a shame as his foreskin was so long it could have housed several refugees and still had room for a live band to play on stage beneath his long forskin. Someone recently asked Ben if he he was Jewish on his forum-the evidence being his name- Ben and his lack of skin. Ben replied that he was saving up to become Jewish.
Apology to JJ
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2003 7:23 pm
by magoo
JJ sorry mate. I used your name before for a joke and forgot to change it back. The above post about Bens foreskin and his ethnicity was not JJ it was me.
Once again sorry JJ.
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2003 10:00 pm
by Steven
I dont think it was Grace Kwek, Magoo. As far as I know, she never got aids. There is an interview with Grace on this page where she comments on Wallice (calls him a murderer) and states that she has never tested positive for Aids or anything else.
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2003 11:13 pm
by Caractacus
An interesting and alarming read. Thanks again, Rock, for digging out thought-provoking stuff.
Like so much in this world, the industry relies on trust, and it only takes one evil, selfish piece of shite to bring that house of cards down.
Way off topic, but does anyone remember when British newspapers used to tackle important issues in an intelligent way, presenting facts and letting the reader make their own minds up about the issue? Nowadays they get press awards for exclusives on some Fame Academy nobody's zit crisis.
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:14 am
by magoo
I know Steven. Thats what I said! I answered Richie by saying that it was a different girl! Stroll on!
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:24 am
by mike johnson
Male newborns are routinely circumcised in the US.
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2003 11:38 am
by woodgnome
why?
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2003 11:54 am
by mike johnson
I am not sure why. I have the vague notion that the procedure began in the late 19th Century as a measure against masturbation, & was revived in the mid-20th for hygiene purposes. There is considerable debate as to whether the practce should continue; the AMA has stated that there is no good medical reason for it, but other than in California, fairly recently, it is still SOP.
Most of the girls I have dated have never seen an uncircumcised cock, & some have no idea such a thing even exists.One g/f, who gave great head, made a very cogent statement, referring to uncircmcised penises: "I'm not putting one in MY mouth!".Quite a compelling argument IMHO.
Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2003 1:15 pm
by woodgnome
she would find it hard to get ahead with that attitude over here (boom! boom!).

Re: O/T But alarming
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:58 pm
by Crimpo
Yup - you have identified her correctly I'm sure as Brooke Ashley - the fourth infected actress was a Czech/Hungarian girl who went by a single name but I can't remember it - Luke Ford has the details. Wallace just showed how one evil bastard can do serious damage.