Page 2 of 3
Re: Is the Sony PD170 too far over the hill
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 3:52 pm
by one eyed jack
3D!!? Oh dear lord no!
You dont have to be a prophet to see how that one is going to get abused will you?
Everyone wil be filming spunk shots cumminatcha in 3D so its like you are getting the facial
Unless you are a cum dodger then you'll be alright
3D porn wont be too long in the offing Im sure but I can see where porn is concerned that it wil be a novelty where the effect supercedes the content.
Re: Is the Sony PD170 too far over the hill
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:05 pm
by SpunkySam
Well the worlds first consumer 3d cam was unveiled at CES a couple of weeks back priced at $22000 so i dont think it will be too long at all before we see 3d porn from the American market at least.
Re: Is the Sony PD170 too far over the hill
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:22 pm
by Sarah Kelly
and....wouldnt one have to wear the silly glasses?A bit of a killer for couples..and.....everyone i know who has glasses misplaces them at one time or another....a bit of a bummer if you were feleing horny x
Re: Under the "Ridiculous but True"catagory
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:25 pm
by Sarah Kelly
Cheers guys !thumbsup!..... I appreciate the heads up,and am off to get an ebay account right now!happy! x
Re: Is the Sony PD170 too far over the hill
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:25 pm
by SpunkySam
The other big thing will be 3d tvs that dont need glasses, none are ready for release yet but until then its silly glasses lol
Re: Is the Sony PD170 too far over the hill
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:15 pm
by one eyed jack
3D without glasses!? Thats practically real life.
Cant imagine it without some visual interface between the naked eye and televisiual equipment but then nor did I envision porn would be available for free on the internet 20 years ago
Re: Is the Sony PD170 too far over the hill
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:48 pm
by SpunkySam
Heres the 3D Camcorder
http://gizmodo.com/5441912/worlds-first ... -this-fall
And here is the 3D TV without glasses
http://hackaday.com/2010/01/09/ces-3d-t ... t-glasses/
The effect is similar to one of those little hologram stickers.
Re: Under the "Ridiculous but True"catagory
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:35 am
by erotic images
Here is a couple of posts from the camcorder link you have just got to laugh
En0s1 01/06/10
I hope this is technology that isn't adopted by the porn industry. Reply
The5thElephant 01/06/10
@En0s1: Remove "I hope" and replace "isn't" with "will be". Reply
Re: Under the "Ridiculous but True"catagory
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:51 am
by paul jones
It was only in summer lasty year that I traded up from a 1999 Sony TRV 900, and I still use it as a second camera and risky shots - i.e. risk of getting wet/dropped etc - because it is now pretty much worthless.
Re: Is the Sony PD170 too far over the hill
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:23 pm
by Sarah Kelly
OMG-Chuck in one of those "Sex Suites" and you can have whole weekends of Orgiastic pleasure,by yourself! Use Tesco online and you neednt even leave the house for anything, (like if you run out of lube or tea bags) as you indulge in your 72hr orgasmfest!happy!........ x