egafd.com

OK I won't be checking here after today. I did find one or two very possibles who we will take very seriously, but on the whole it was a dissapointing exploation into new territory. Thank you to all who replied, I think the short listed people know who they are . Anyone else you have till midnight today.

emorck's very impressive cv in mainstream film and TV would suggest this was an opportunity not to be missed:

emorck 1 : 0 uglydaz

uglydaz o.g.

I contacted him, had a very sensible detailed answer and put two of my regular models who both have some acting experience, one for each role, straight onto him.

He's done "The Professionals" apparently. And "Lovejoy" (not a porn film)

I hope your girls are successful Toybox, and you illustrate the point I was trying to make.

Such a public challenge to a well respected director, without conducting prior research, may not have been the best way to go about representing one's clients' best interests.

Hi Al,

Sorry but does 'emorck' go under another name as doing a search for emorck on Google, IMDB (Internet Movie database) or tv.com does not bring up any results. Even my friend who does rasterization on several films turns up on IMDB and she is a very small clog in a big wheel.

Also logic prevails: Why hire porn actresses for non-porn parts. I assume to get maybe an effective girl of the night type part. BUT there are plenty of actresses that can do that type of role. Not suggestioning it but Billy Piper played a cracking girl in that Diary series and pretty sure there many aspiring trained actresses that could play and pary suggested upto nude... Then that is assuming the 'role' is just to nude level...

So this John Emorck... obviously I need to do further research but still cannot understand why his name does not come up on Google or even why he is using a personal account rather than a business account.... Maybe I am just cynical....expect the worse etc...

...or maybe I am correct once again.

Ron.

Dear Ron etc. I did say that I would not look at this forum again, but I am promted to answer your posting. What 'worse' do you fear? Emork is of course not my name it is an email address. Everybody who has emailed me has been given a Imdb reference. Please understand that if the details are made widely available we will get inundated by so called agents who charge for their services to usually totally unsuitable actors (I've said all this before) and I have also explained that in doing this I am just spreading the net wider. It was just an idea because one or two porn stars are making it big in LA-bringing something fresh. In all probability the parts will go to 'proper' actors but I am taking this seriuosly, just give me a bit of respect. Oh, and if you want to know more, in confidence, just email me, as I originally requested. That's it no more from me, sorry to have bothered you all!.

Makes you wonder how private detectives managed to earn themselves a crust before we had google lol.

Anyway, it's good to hear that John has at least been considering the acting attributes of a recent 'muse' of mine. What a pity that two clowns on here have potentially ruined that possibility via their uninformed comments under this thread.

When a director of this standing decides what sort of girl would suit a role, he obviously has valid artistic reasons for doing so, and a very impressive CV on IMDB it is by the way.

Don't take this the wrong way, but this might just be a case of wRONg again!

Have you been asleep for the last year in regards to fakesters calling themselves this and that? Have you met the guy. He may well be honest so I'll hand out the olive branch to him.

So Alan have you really met him or just 'chatted' over MSN/email/telephone?

Its not difficult to pretend to be someone else in this day and age so if you are putting your reputation online for this chap then fair enough.

Bit of a Ron T. Storm in a teacup going on here.

You e-mail the man, he tells you his real name and the project details, you put your potential actresses in touch with him.

Simples. At least it was for me

Anyone who can't tell the difference between that straightforward business procedure and the spate of iron lung confined fakes appearing on here recently simply isn't paying sufficient attention

Now can anyone put me in touch with Cindy Milo (Mike Reid's "Pussy In Boots", On The Box Productions, Certificate 18, 1994)?

Ron, if you're that concerned about this matter you should do as was suggested and validate the credentials yourself.

And whilst we're on the subject, perhaps you could refrain from trying to influence who I should and shouldn't work with in an artistic capacity in future. It wasn't an issue for your business partner who very kindly assisted with my printing requirements. So please don't let personal vendettas get in the way of others' legitimate activities that are none of your business.