Page 2 of 2
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:49 am
by Bicycle Bum
I could think of a few veteran girls who are in some ways hornier to watch now due to their MILF status than they were when they first started. Angel Long pops into my head. Her flawless ass can't be bettered.
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:27 am
by JasonThickCock
New ones please! Once I've seen one girl with a bone inside her I need to move on! Probably why I get wood even before my pants even come off!
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 4:08 am
by Kimberly Scott
Hi boys and girls

Glad you like the thread and thanks for voting

xxx
Kim xx
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:07 pm
by Kimberly Scott
Hi there peeps
Thanks for all your votes.. me personally would love to see a bit fresh meat. For almost 2 years around I'm tired seing same old people doin same old stuff everywhere.
Totally agree that established models bring fans (traffic) but think that new (ish) once deserve chance to prove themselves (and let's skip "casting couch, tfp, tfcd and content share" shoots for a bit)
Of course to work with names like Harmony, Bluebird, Killergram and so on requires experince, there is no doubt about that so let's make it 30/70 instead 50/50, how about that?

xxx
Sweet dreams people!

xx
Kim xx
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:46 pm
by nasty
Good performers. (That's a full stop afterwards!)
Established faces if they're good performers, and new up and coming (should that be up and cuming?) talent if they can walk the walk.
But the emphasis should be on the performance just not whether fresh meat is being wheeled in or established performers who just go through the motions.
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:53 pm
by Kimberly Scott
well said hun

x
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:21 pm
by Matt P
Ermm sorry couldn't resist this one,
I like it both ways (ermm unfortunate sexual conotionations unintentional).
I love seeing the top stars do what they're good at but then it's exciting to see a new face as well as the obvious parts.
I don't think you could transpose the 2 though I mean you can't really subsitute a star & likewise you can't use a star if you're doing a "real" thing, I'm sure that has a proper term but my eye hurts too much to think.
Have fun fellow filth-thespians.
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:36 am
by Dave Wells
The biz has always revolved around new girls from the good old days of presenting mag sets of girls nobody else had. Every girl had indeed has a shelf life so any producer who had/has her first or exclusively will benefit from that fact. Girls will of course build up a following or fan base in time if they stay around but will probably fade away at some stage. One notable exception for me is the still stunning Donna Collins/Ambrose/Danica who has resisted doing boy/girl (ok dabblings with face sitting and Lady Sonia apart) but remains - around !
Re: new or current girls, this is the question?
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:07 am
by Arsewithclass
Why any stroppy remarks? Thts a fair & cool question to see what others think.
I personally would have thought many would think like I. This is that I certainly enjoy watching new girls or the same girls but I enjoy watching them be themselves & different. What I do not like to see is all the girls that seem to take on the same style all the time. I think its the director & producers hard work, keeping up with origional ideas, that makes the adult scene & star something special.
Maybe its slightly down to the producer & director, cameraman & lighting that makes the star, & the stars hardwork makes the film. Therefore, as long as they all have the spark, you could never get bored.