egafd.com

Bit confused here

firstly Alfie Moon states

"kudos to Joanna Jet for taking she-males into the mainstream"

Then states

"Joanna Jet will never be accepted into the mainstream adult press"

Me thinks he likes to hear the sound of his own typewriter does our Alfie

JP

Hi,

First up, I need to make a correction for a blonde moment. Issue 38-13 of Mayfair was from December 2003 and it has already been published.

Yes, the feature did cover full frontal but no, it did not include an erection as this would have put it outside of the law for a UK soft porn mag (in fact, they had to photoshop me down a little in one of the pics!!).

With regard to your other comments, that was one of the underlying reasons for my move to LA. Everyday I fight negative stereotypes in the adult industry and almost all of the resistence in the porn industry is down to this.
With every step that I make towards presence in the mainstream, I make a small but meaningful change in, at least, how I am perceived along with hopefully the gender I represent.

Gays and lesbians did indeed take a long time to be accepted but the reason they eventually did is because some chose to no longer remain in the shadows and became a positive message in the public eye.

The "There's something about Miriam" show on SKY played on fear and prejudice of a community that has no positive presence in the mainstream. This is exactly why I feel I must be in places such as this forum in order to redress the balance in any way I can.


With regard to Vivid, Elegant, Jules Jordan, Lex Steele etc.., I already have contacts in that arena and I can assure you that what you consider as an impossibility is something that I now know I am making into just a matter of time.


Yours sincerely,


Joanna Jet
xxx

joannajet wrote:


> - Would Mayfair have published a double-page spread for someone
> they considered as male?

Have you got a cock ? have you been in Mayfair ?

> - If a shemale in just a thong is virtually undetectable from
> the real thing, does that not make her more of a girl with a
> cock than a male with breasts?

Real thing ? so your thing is not real ?

> - Is it really possible to feel that outraged or sickened by an
> entry in the BGAFD that includes (TS) after a performer's name?

I don't think anyone on this site is outraged or sickened at the thought of you being listed in the BGAFD , I feel this site was set up to make a comprehensive list of actresses who have , are , or want to work in the uk Adult film industry .

> - If the porn industry has already classified transsexual
> videos as being a niche product within the mainstream market
> and accepted as having no relation to the gay market, where is
> the harm in also including transsexual performers in a
> mainstream listing?

I can't claim to fully understand the porn industry , but I do find this hard to believe , please someone post a link to support this claim as the only thing I have read about TS films being made for the Straight market was by Ben Dover himself , and as he is or is going to invest cash in your good self ,I guess he would , personly I would rather he invested in making classic porn with good story lines like "Money for nothing and the sex for free"

> - Does the thought of clicking on a girl's name and finding out
> that she has a cock really so distressing? After all, hasn't
> everyone seen everything on the Internet already?

No , but if I started to make films of me having sex with my blow up doll , Tarty Doris , (who has a great pair of plastic tits) will she get a listing too ?

> As my challenging questions may suggest I do consider
> joining the ranks of performers on the BGAFD as something of
> worth, but I also accept that it is the opinion of fan members
> that hold the greatest influence and I will bow down gracefully
> if things do not go my way.

Personly I don't mind if you are listed and I hope you do well on the US and UK scenes , but I do feel that your just flogging a product , and this is all just good PR for you a bloke making money with his cock ,but I think its time and space wasted that could be used for real girls in the industry .

My view on this:

ok, so Joanna Jet is a Pre-Op Transexual Porn Actor/Actress who makes Videos & pics, big fucking deal what her sexual Organs are.

Joanna has labeled herself a Female, hell, she has 1/2 the bodyparts as is...

If the ppl at BGAFD want to put her on the Actress Database, so fucking what.

Personally, I am not into She/Males, but there ARE lots of ppl who are, so if they buy her material, then there is a market for that Material. And as such, that quantifies the reasons why she Is/Could/Will be shown on the BGAFD Database.

If you yourself do not want to know about She/Males etc, DON'T bother reading the Threads containing discussions on/including/or about She/Males/Tran-Sexuals etc.

If you DO NOT like She/Males, then DON'T view her Material.