egafd.com

videokim wrote:
> So who will say what new films are acceptable to data base &
> which ones not when its all internet media formats?

Put simply- the mods. It's their decision, ultimately. As usual,
they'll have to tread the fine line between pragmatism and
comprehensiveness.
All we can do as 'concerned citizens' is discuss the issue and
offer suggestions.... I'd assumed that the largely self-contained
nature of the UK industry and [comparatively] small number of
performers would have made it easier to keep up with new
methods of release- but it seems that this may have been wishful
thinking. I had hoped active contributors would somehow be able
to save, cap and upload here all the new online-only releases.

As for my area of interest, Euro stuff, we're already at saturation-
point on egafd with just the DVD stuff. There's more appearing
than can reasonably be accomodated- for me, personally, just
accurately cataloguing the stuff I've already got access to may
well occupy the next five years.
EBI has made a start with online content by listing relevant websites
under individual actress' listings- but I have my doubts about the
ultimate utility of this approach, especially when the day comes that
many girls have online content only. How does one deal with the
essentially transient nature of these? When, as they often do,
websites disappear, much of the content too presumably vanishes
from the public domain, unless it's re-uploaded elsewhere.

Films should be listed on their wankability !wink!

Kim makes a very good point. There are plenty names that dont get a mention but seem to be more popular than the mainstream stars like that In Bed With Faith, Juicy Jo to name but a couple who became famous from websites alone but Faith is one who wont get a mention here because she is web site based which incidentally is filmed so therefore it does merit addition.

Furthermore I disagree with the view downloads are here and gone tomorrow. They are more here than dvd which might go out of print but make up a website as permanent content.

I think websites should be included in the database for girls appearances in adult product.

Great idea- except that one man's 'wankability' [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/love.gif[/img] is another man's
'living nightmare' [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/puke.gif[/img]

one eyed jack wrote:
> Furthermore I disagree with the view downloads are here and
> gone tomorrow. They are more here than dvd which might go out
> of print but make up a website as permanent content.

Permanent? Really???
And someone, somewhere, will always have a copy of a given
DVD.

> I think websites should be included in the database for girls
> appearances in adult product.
I tend to agree, but see my comment above on EBI's present
approach.

jj wrote:

> Great idea- except that one man's 'wankability'
> [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/love.gif[/img] is another
> man's
> 'living nightmare'
> [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/puke.gif[/img]
>
planeterotica wrote:

No jj the wankability of a film should be decided by a committe made up of 50% females and 50% males, i of course would be the 50% male part the rest being VideoKim, Angel Long, Isabel Ice and Poppy Morgan and if between us we couldnt wank over a film then it shouldnt be listed, i of course would only expect to be paid expences !wink!

I've just been reading through all of these posts- this must be one of the best threads for ages...

Kim- I didn't know that amateurs made films! I thought it was all producers in and out of UKAP and then sold via 'names' or sex shops. I thought your films sold via word of mouth.

You learn something every day....

Colonel do you know who the members of UKAP are?

A cross section of producers at different levels of the business. Its just an association. Kim was welcome to join if she wanted too.

Just thought I'd let you know

I'm up for some naughty group stuff xxx

Hi Terry

I would honestly join the UKAP as you all do a great job but i am not only a pornstar/producer, as well we are organising parties, swinging events etc we have a large flock of unknown amateur film makers who rely on our help as well as lots of escorts who John builds sites for & does their photo's/vids for AW & Clips for sale, all these other things are really frowned upon on here by most.
I don't mean by you Terry as you are a fair decent bloke who i would do business with any day & would advise others the same, most of our friends have introduced themselves on here only to be slated & shot down which is sad when we are the ones they look up at & if we are not prepared to help where do they go.
I would be always be trying to help the little guys as i do now & would be more of a burden to your committe with my conflict of interests, i still love you Terry as you are a great guy & you can be trusted which is a big thing in my book.

Kim x