egafd.com

My apologies if I have caused any offence to the above named model, I recognised her from a photographers profile & merely wanted to know if there was any other work of her out there in the public domain as I find her incredibly beautiful.

Karups stated on a email she had used a toy so perhaps they were mistaken.

With regards to the change of name if they don't want to be recognised then don't do it ?

they stagger the release of the sets, i know of 5 sets and 5 vids so far.

let it be said though she is a very very good model

There's 3 on the site? They should have a preview part so you know what's coming

'Also, there is a reason that she uses the name Chloe on Karups and to you guys who introduced her real name onto the public forums you are mean spirited, stupid and counterproductive. '

Can you explain a bit more, I don't think I understand why she uses 2 different names. Why should models use their real names? If it is her 'real' name.

Maybe she might get more work with more exposure. I thought that because Karups has so many girls that naming conflicts would arise and their USP of having 'exclusive' girls would not be tarnished.

Surely the actual model would know more. I am not too sure of the actual 'game' of being a model. Keep 1 name for nude work and a different name for more explicit stuff. What is the point?

Of course if she complains then this thread will into the ether.

I assumed that the name mentioned in the title was a modelling name (like, for example, Cate Harrington.)

I am taking exception with what has been said here.

I have not seen anyone being mean spirited here.

Someone has asked for further information on a model and other's answered the request for information.
Then there was some discussion of the set.

The same thing happens on other sites all the time and people are a good deal less courteous about the models/ photographers than on here.

This is an adult forum and people discuss the adult industry.

There has been nothing derogatory said about the model indeed many people have been very complimentary.

If the model does not do adult work anymore then that is her prerogative.

The questions are legitimate questions about a model who did an adult shoot and signed a release that allowed her pics put on an Adult Site.

There was absolutely no need for the thread to be titled Amie Dodgson, no content appears of her under this name. What was wrong with titleing the thread "Model called Chloe on Karups?"

Had this thread been more sensibly titled and conducted I might have been inclined to direct the posters to other content of her, or even better.... had anyone interested simply emailed or privately messaged me then I would have told you.

I've been in touch with model.
Please delete this thread.

The OP, myself and the model herself have been in touch with Admin with a deletion request and still the thread is here.

This is now a serious and unecessary breach of the models privacy and is totally unacceptable.

If you see a model with a name on one site and a name on another site it is reasonable to assume that they are both pseudonyms. You can't be expected to know which name is the model's preferred name. How can you be sure that the name on the site is not one randomly assigned by the site?

If a model chooses to put his or her real name on a site that is their choice.

The same thing would have happened anyway. A person would have put a link up then ten minutes later someone would have said that is model A B or C

Also I did not know you were the photographer who took the pictures until you said you were and I don't know if anyone else would know this either. Therefor I and other's may not have automatically known to contact you directly for information or whether you would have been able to give it.

You can't dictate how people search for information on how to get the content that they want. You can merely choose to respond or not to respond.