Page 3 of 5

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 6:39 am
by magoo
Spot on Ace. When I was a kid my grandma died. She wanted to be cremated wearing her wedding ring. The staff at the hospital begged my dad to take it with him because as they said "the mortuary is full of jewellery thieves". Sick cunts stealing from dead people makes me puke.

I will tell you what. You will notice all undertakers get buried from home (ie coffin stays in the house not in some shitty funeral home) thats because they know that the undertakers and pall bearers are a bunch of theiving slags. They tend to be off duty firemen . Firemen like to moan about not getting 30k but they all work as theiving undertaker cunts in their spare time.

Undertakers. Ive shit em. I even saw the greedy twats taking the brass handles and screws from a coffin before it was buried. Shite-Hawks.

And before our resident firefighter kicks my arse let me share this with you. Paramedic takes six years training and gets 16k and spends 97% of time at work on a job. Firefighter takes six WEEKS training gets paid 22k to sleep most of the time and spends 9% of time on a shout. Theres something wrong there isnt there. Should Ambo bods not be paid at LEAST as much as Firefighters bearing in mind the tougher and longer hours?

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 6:43 am
by magoo
Ace are you sure that The British Army has a no landmines policy? Im not convinced mate. The Royal Ordinance Corp would all be down the job centre otherwise.

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 6:50 am
by Ace
Thats anti-armoury mines, not personnel

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 7:02 am
by magoo
Buttsie Mate,

I only just noticed your reference to Animal Farm. Very true.

Who do reckon would play Boxer though? None of us I think. He truely was a hero was Boxer. He worked and toiled and never questioned "the pigs" rulings? It was sad when poor old Boxer snuffed it. Brilliant book.

Then those pig cunts came in etc etc etc

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 7:28 am
by magoo
Oh I See. Sorry about that. I just thought anti tank mines were just as harmfull as anti personell mines. If stepped on..........BOOM ...."wheres me legs." "Dont worry mate your legs were not blown off by an anti personell mine it was an anti tank mine". "oh thats Ok then cheers lads"

Not taking the piss Ace. You know my opinion on this farce of a war!

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 7:38 am
by Ace
if you stepped on an anti-tank mine, you'd lose a lot more than a leg, a LOT more.

I agree with the farcity of the last war, we all know that too

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 7:40 am
by Ace
I liked Catcher in the Rye, first rate and a book that I never tire of reading.

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 8:22 am
by steve56
wasnt that the fave of mark chapman that killed lennon?

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 8:38 am
by Ace
Yes it was Steve, maybe thats why I like it so much. Actually, we HAD to read it in school, and seeing as The Hobbit is for wankers, I chose Catcher.............a wise choice!

Re: Mods = Bookburners?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 8:39 am
by alec
I didn't remove it, but I have read it, and I'd guess it was removed for it's obnoxious aassumptions about other users of the forum.