Page 3 of 4
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 11:01 am
by steve56
nancy mitford and her chums were nazis,also heard that duke of windsor was pally with hitler?
Anyway back to the ' Shaker's '
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 11:54 am
by Elton Dong
' kula shaker where "outed" as new age nazis by open eye mag '
Really ......some naff mag caused so much strife for a band they split ?
Did they follow ' William Cooper ' ? i thought everyone on the K album had to have a k in their name ?
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 11:56 am
by woodgnome
interesting but if you want to be extra-conspiratorial, the easiest thing in the world is to flip an image...
this blurb offers an alternative origin of the 'bad' swastika notion:
and to further muddy already murky waters: . what this does highlight is the deeply symbolic nature of humankind and the resultant importance attached to intrepreting them. as for the truth...
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 11:58 am
by Holden MacGroyn
Thanx for that Duke.
I actually meant the origins in India of the swatika.
The symbol itself does go back a long way.
Thanx for taking the time to explain what was said. I had no idea about the previous bands or events.
Pretty shocked really!
Playing Hey Dude, will never be the same again!
However.
Anti-semetic. What a bollocks phrase.
Anti = against
Semetic = Semitic languages named after Shem or Sem, the oldest son of Noah.
Anti languages.
Weird really.
So what term describes some one who is against Asians or blacks or any other race?
Anti something or other or just plain racist?
Re: Anyway back to the ' Shaker's '
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 12:12 pm
by the duke
k album cover
crispins version of events
what happened with the nme
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 12:18 pm
by Holden MacGroyn
Cheers but I haven't found anything on the dots or theit representation.
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 12:21 pm
by the duke
no problem more on the shaker below.
i have no problem with them as a band and they are free to believe in what they want.i just think they have been very naive and given remarks to the press that have been misinterpreted.as a group of people they seemed veryhappy and they never hurt anyone so all is well
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 12:26 pm
by Holden MacGroyn
I've just read the links below and it does seem to be blown out of proportion.
No, I'm more than happy to belt out Hey Dude and go into Fender overdrive.
Someone needs to explain anti-semetic.
Hopefully it wont lead to a debate on the middle east situation, although I have no problems saying what I think of that warmonger Sha'ron
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 12:31 pm
by the duke
ive done enough work today i hope someone else will help you holden
Re: private sex parties
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2003 12:39 pm
by steve56
anti-semetic means hater of jewish race!