Page 3 of 5
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 2:14 pm
by WillieBo
Certainly the inference in previous posts was of my being an extremist (hang 'em flog 'em) and with no sympathy or understanding. Absolutely right about the latter. That's why I do not know what rule/section 43/45/69 is but the drift was there as you realised yourself magoo. And you obviously do.
I certainly agree with you about the hypocritical aspect of this. There are people on this message board who seem to excuse what in the very least is UNUSUAL behaviour just because they like one or two of his records.
I am a huge jazz fan and would openly acknowledge that many great jazz musicians of lasting influence were psychotic shithouses. Popular music and the entertainment world in general is full of them.
Who's bad ? Who's bored ?
No, I'm not a po/screw/whatever. I'm one of the despised middle-class professionals.
My last post on this wearisome topic.
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 2:17 pm
by steve56
hi willie bo,benny goodman/artie shaw/tommy dorsey are among my faves,peggy lee some ella,doris day etc.
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 2:37 pm
by The Last Word
I, like many, like one or two of records, WB, but certainly don't 'excuse' what he's alleged to have done on the back of it (and nor do I back-handedly 'excuse' him by not wishing to see him castrated, either). Put simply, if he's guilty, he needs help - like all other 'nonces'. Clear now?
--
"Let's do it..."
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 2:45 pm
by WillieBo
steve, I was thinking more about personal favourites like Miles Davis, Stan Getz and Charlie Mingus who were fucking horrible people. And no, Deuce Bigolo, I didn't actually know them personally.
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 3:35 pm
by davewells
He should be put in jail just for being Michael Jackson. He's an utter TWAT.
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 3:50 pm
by Pervert
With that kind of reasoned argument, Dave, Phil Collins would get the death penalty.
Errm, just realised that's no bad thing.
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:12 pm
by denise davies
hi terry
Thriller,bilie jean,and bad were my fav tunes back n the day.I think it is a coincidence that this complaint is exactly the same as the last one.I just think people want his money.All these high profile stars are always getting accused of something because there easy targets.The Coby bryant case was the funiest they had no evidence whatsoever and they stll carried on the case for a media show nothing more.I have studied law and if that was a normal case that would have been thrown out.as for micheal i hope he didnt do it .I might be biased because im a lakers fan.
denise davies
www.denisedaviesworld.com
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 5:51 pm
by Terry May
Why does he wear only one glove? Is that the hand he uses for his heinous crimes and therefore no fingerprints?
Re: Michael Jackson - the evidence against
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 5:59 pm
by steve56
naughty naughty naughty,praps he lost the other glove in the wash,lol.