Page 3 of 3
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 8:16 am
by WillieBo
'Not that well known but as good as anything written by a British composer.'
It is a very nice piece of music, very catchy, and especially good when one considers MacCunn wrote it when only 18. It was critically rebuffed at the time by many and has had a few recorded advocates in recent years.
I think it was the signature tune to a tv series some years back about a Scottish lawyer. (Maybe with the big bloke who was in Budgie).
But it's not that good that it equates with the great works written by many other British composers. The list of works that are better than this overture is simply too long to list.
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 9:01 am
by DavidS
Perhaps technically it had flaws, but as Sir Thomas Beecham once remarked, "The British don't like music, they only like the noise it makes."
I believe you are right about the signature tune to 'Sutherland's Law' though. Trying to remember the name of the actor it the leading role.
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 10:41 am
by WillieBo
And a very fine noise this makes as well. 'Technically flawed' ? I don't know but they seem very assured pieces within the late 19th Century idiom.
You may know the other overture-concert pieces he wrote. Two others are on an excellent Hyperion CD. But whilst musically interesting and strongly melodic, they are of a type. They are firmly in the sonata-allegro form, which gives rise to their often repeated melody and rhythmic power.
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 1:34 pm
by Pervert
Iain Cuthbertson.
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 6:36 pm
by alec
As the procurator fiscal in Sutherland's Law. It's taken half the day for me to remember that title. Now all I have to do uis remember the name of the author of the book spun off from the series and I can find the book.
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 5:44 am
by DavidS
I do not have the musical knowledge to comment whether the piece is technically flawed or not. I merely made the suggestion as a possible explaination of why it is not as popular as I think it should be. I am probably the person Sir Thomas had in mind when he made his comment!
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 9:20 am
by WillieBo
I doubt it ; the ears are the most reliable gauge of whether music is good or not. You're spot-on. It's a very fine concert piece and deserves a wider audience.
MacCunn is one of many neglected composers in Britain. But his creativity did seem to tail off quite markedly after 1900.
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:06 am
by Ace
The way this country is going with all this PC bollocks and the like, I would have thought 'Stranger in a Strange Land' is pretty apt
Re: National Anthems
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 8:05 am
by DavidS
The Scots seem to have a wide range of excellent choices that would make an appropriate National Anthem. I do wonder what possessed them to make the awful choice they did. Possibly the best choice would be the final few minutes of the last movement of the No 3 Scottish Symphony by Felix Mendelssohn (1809-1847). It is superb.