Page 3 of 3

Re: ..............actually (again)

Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:50 pm
by jj
P123: very good- and the (far more menacing and realistic) violence was strictly that necessary for plotting purposes.

Re: The Taking of Pelham 123

Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:51 pm
by jj
Great age brings with it better taste, obviously.... ;-))
Welcome to the club.

Re: Kill Bill

Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:52 pm
by jj
Make that 'Bury Quentin in His Own Ordure', and yer on.

Re: The Taking of Pelham 123

Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 1:55 pm
by The Last Word
You've hit the nail on the head, WB. I've no probelm with violence in cinema as a rule - DW Griffith set the ball rolling and it hasn't stopped yet, but it was the way the whole 'hip and trendy' ethic got introduced to cinema via QT's popularity within the media in the early 90's that set my teeth on edge. Deeming something fashionable throws all objective critique out of the window - hugely detrimental to a medium such as cinema and conveniently blinding all those wretched Taranteenees to his blatant cut 'n' paste approach - and I suppose with Kill Bill we'll be waiting in vain for a return of the relative maturity he began to show in Jackie Brown.


Re: The Taking of Pelham 123

Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 5:05 pm
by WillieBo
I wish it did, jj, I wish it did.

Re: The Taking of Pelham 123

Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 6:46 pm
by jj
That explains my predilection for sci-fi, then..........

Re: Kill Bill

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 7:06 am
by lovemunkey187
............and there I was thinking that it was all just entertainment.