egafd.com

...all's fair in love and war......(and I bit back a bit, so what the Hell....)...I'm always amazed at how FEW real misunderstandings there are on this site.
Most posters (with the obvious few exceptions) seem thoroughly decent chaps.
Especially that Wendy chap. What a lovely bloke he is.....and as for that Rebekah cove....
must dash, time for my medication.

The Farce is with us........
Be afraid.
VERY afraid.

......BTW, any ideas (back O/T after 20+ posts !!!) about Sarah McLean?
I mean, of course, about her height: I have several other ideas about her, but they are unsuitable for replication on the pages of this august journal.

You really are worse than me JJ! Thanks for the compliments though. Hey Buttsie are you ready to take over the drunk-shift? I must sleep soon.

I am still stnding with tape measure awaiting Angel & Amy. They could sort me out. Lovely long lanky lasses!

Read in the Sunday Spurt that u were 6'8" with stilettos on. Is this true or simply one of DS infamous exaggerations?
Ta.

PS Your luvvly (sorry!)

No......6'4" + 4" heels is....errr.....three-quarters of a gallon.
What's that in litres?
But the girls DO seem to be getting taller: better Post-War nutrition, perhaps?

Seem to rememeber reading jj, that Sarah Mclean was a only a dwarf at 5'10

Must be all that free school milk or something.

only other girl I could throw into the mix, could maybe be Lara Latex, she has long legs anyway, but might just have a short top half, or maybe her sexual need is to have sex with midgets.

Marino would have been able to tell us (!!):
If there's a Govt. scheme for the 'vertically-challenged' ladies in town, covering those poor lassies under 5'11!, can I adopt Sarah?
SOLELY as a an act of charity, you understand.......
BTW, if even Crofter can't think of any Btits over 6/5, then only The Management can help.