No, it doesn't: it's COMPLETELY ambiguous.
And I LOVE it, as I do your second para.
What the Hell.........
and I didn't get an apology for your prior rudeness.
Im straddling a piano!
-
alec
Re: Im straddling a piano!
jj wrote:
>
> there are/have been occasions when vaguely
> similar "advertising" posts have been deleted without comment.
No there haven't. I can't think of any occasion when a post by or about a listed model informing us of her video, live appearance or magazine work has been removed.
>
> there are/have been occasions when vaguely
> similar "advertising" posts have been deleted without comment.
No there haven't. I can't think of any occasion when a post by or about a listed model informing us of her video, live appearance or magazine work has been removed.
-
jj
Re: Im straddling a piano!
Apologies, then.
I must have imagined it....... perhaps the instances which I'm thinking of have had a suspect URL?
I must have imagined it....... perhaps the instances which I'm thinking of have had a suspect URL?
-
alec
Re: Im straddling a piano!
Very probably - or were unlisted, not models at all or off-topic.
-
jj
Re: Im straddling a piano!
Then, apologies Part 2: I'm eating more Humble Pie than a 70s groupie (that's an in-joke for visitors here over the voting age, BTW.....).
I was gonna do a search, but my life-span is a bit too short.
Hey, ho.
I was gonna do a search, but my life-span is a bit too short.
Hey, ho.
-
Frank
Re: Im straddling a piano!
Well Well 24 entries. Valencia I am delighted you have generated such interest but how does jj define h/c?
h/c in my view, and I think most peoples, goes beyond b/g f*****g and inclues g/g action where oral sex and insertions are part of the action.
If that is h/c by your definition too then you cannot seen Valencia in action. Her TAC appearances were h/c action even if viewed from soft angles.
If you look hard enough you can find hard g/g action of her where the action is certainly hard shown from hard angles. Not everything that she has done is listed on this database.
Those of us that that seen her in action adore her and I for one have bought men only simply too see more of her albeit in a soft core mag.
Keep keeping us informed Valencia!
XXXX
Frank
h/c in my view, and I think most peoples, goes beyond b/g f*****g and inclues g/g action where oral sex and insertions are part of the action.
If that is h/c by your definition too then you cannot seen Valencia in action. Her TAC appearances were h/c action even if viewed from soft angles.
If you look hard enough you can find hard g/g action of her where the action is certainly hard shown from hard angles. Not everything that she has done is listed on this database.
Those of us that that seen her in action adore her and I for one have bought men only simply too see more of her albeit in a soft core mag.
Keep keeping us informed Valencia!
XXXX
Frank
-
jj
VZ, possibly.........
...at last !!!
...... an intelligent attempt at the question: this was the VERY thing I was trying to get Alec, etc. to clarify .....reading FAQ 1, it would seem that your description would NOT qualify, alas...
.......so it's good night from me and goodnight from him..........
...... an intelligent attempt at the question: this was the VERY thing I was trying to get Alec, etc. to clarify .....reading FAQ 1, it would seem that your description would NOT qualify, alas...
.......so it's good night from me and goodnight from him..........
-
Frank
Re: VZ, possibly.........
Thanks for the compliment but my reading of FAQ 1.2 includes these words:
but we would count any video that contains vaginal or anal insertion by penis, dildo, finger or other objects,
On this criteria Valencia's g/g films are hard core.
There may be lots of different views as to what constitutes hard core but in my profession where such a subjective judgement has to be made, a standard accepted principle is what the man in the street would say if described the g/g action and asked if he thought it hard core.
His answer would be yes. Unless of course the questioner picks on you! So whilst being entitled to your minority view, you should not try and impose it on the majority - thats not democratic.
but we would count any video that contains vaginal or anal insertion by penis, dildo, finger or other objects,
On this criteria Valencia's g/g films are hard core.
There may be lots of different views as to what constitutes hard core but in my profession where such a subjective judgement has to be made, a standard accepted principle is what the man in the street would say if described the g/g action and asked if he thought it hard core.
His answer would be yes. Unless of course the questioner picks on you! So whilst being entitled to your minority view, you should not try and impose it on the majority - thats not democratic.
-
alec
Re: VZ, possibly.........
To clarify - that includes the finger of a male, another girl or the girl herself, or dildo wielded by male, another girl or the girl herself. Some girls are also listed who have appeared in soft or non-sex roles in films which include the above performed by other listed girls, e.g. Andrea clarke in Cannes Story's (sic).
As well as TAC or TVX programmes, most of which were done hard but filmed soft, there are some videos listed which do not qualify by the above criteria as when they were listed it was unclear what they included or because they helped with IDs (such as Shagnasty and Muttley which were mostly simulated). We try not to list 18-certificate stuff, but I feel an exception coming on as I have just obtained the 1971 18-certificate semi-documentary Naughty which includes a behind the scenes look at the filming of a John Lindsay short, Sex After School, which featured Lucienne Camille and an unknown performer. Naughty will be listed out of historical interest, as well as the short. BTW I think I remember seeing this short in a full, but soft, version. Lucienne Camille is a babysitter for a girl who is almost as old as she is. LC has sex with a boyfriend on the couch behind the girl who is sittng at her desk doing her homework. The girl joins in. Does this ring any bells with any one?
As well as TAC or TVX programmes, most of which were done hard but filmed soft, there are some videos listed which do not qualify by the above criteria as when they were listed it was unclear what they included or because they helped with IDs (such as Shagnasty and Muttley which were mostly simulated). We try not to list 18-certificate stuff, but I feel an exception coming on as I have just obtained the 1971 18-certificate semi-documentary Naughty which includes a behind the scenes look at the filming of a John Lindsay short, Sex After School, which featured Lucienne Camille and an unknown performer. Naughty will be listed out of historical interest, as well as the short. BTW I think I remember seeing this short in a full, but soft, version. Lucienne Camille is a babysitter for a girl who is almost as old as she is. LC has sex with a boyfriend on the couch behind the girl who is sittng at her desk doing her homework. The girl joins in. Does this ring any bells with any one?
-
jj
Re: VZ, possibly.........
Alas, yes: I remember Lucienne.
Have applied for pension book.
Thanks for the above: but you omitted to mention how many angels are capable of dancing on the head of a pin.......
Have applied for pension book.
Thanks for the above: but you omitted to mention how many angels are capable of dancing on the head of a pin.......